The termination of the life of an unborn fetus.
How to get abortion
Sort:
Is it same as resigning?
No, it ends before the beginning.
I'm pretty sure he's talking about aborting a game, not a fetus. Still, this is an amusingly-titled topic.
Best thread title I've seen in quite a while!
Maybe this will help?
I'm laughing really hard right now
And you know what the best thing about this thread is? The mods can't do anything about it! It's asking a legitimate chess-related question!
Nov 27, 2013
0
#11
macer75 wrote:
And you know what the best thing about this thread is? The mods can't do anything about it! It's asking a legitimate chess-related question!
We think... 
As organizer of the Troll of the Month contests, I have to remain neutral myself. That's why I never nominate anybody or vote for anybody, and I put up all valid nominations that I receive without filtering them.
harryz wrote:
The title of this thread is being completely misinterpreted
I'm surprised that you get it. Looks like you have a dirtier mind than I assumed...
harryz wrote:
The title of this thread is being completely misinterpreted
No way?!
Nov 27, 2013
0
#16
It's easy to misinterpret something without a disinterpretation. I'll try to disinterpret this to avoid misinterpretations. How you interpret this is up to you.
To disinerpret something is to make it easier to interpret. Of course, it's possible to misinterpret the disinterpretation. Therefore, without adequate disinterpretation, it is easy to misinterpret things. The title has been (deliberatley? or am I misinterpreting this?) misinterpreted because there's no disinterpretation. In fact, it's possible to misinterpret the word disinterpret. Though misinterpretations are still interpretations.
Is this enough disinterpretation of an interpretative interpretation of disinterpretation to avoid misinterpretations? 
Nov 27, 2013
0
#17
vistopia, you picked a hilarious name for this thread, I just came here out of curiosity because it was in "Most Recent Posts" and I have to say this gave me a laugh...
Oh man, this is a classic. Poor guy, honest question.
Nov 27, 2013
0
#19
olichris wrote:
No this is not sufficent at all Adam
Your interpretation of your disinterpretation of an interpretative disinterpretation in order to avoid misinterpretation is only correct if the original staement has been accurately identified as a misinterpretation thus any form of disinterpretation which I beleive you did ask for, relies on your belief that a misinterpretation has occured in the first place, any future disinterpretations of the original statement are therefore null and void unless your request for disinterpretation can be vailidatied by an independant interpretation in order to be sure that your original request for a disinterptretation was in fact valid !
I think you misinterpreted what I said. I never said misinterpretation is a prerequisite for disinterpretation. My interpretation is that you have misinterpreted the meaning of disinterpret.
What does it mean ??