Is it harder to find a brilliant tactical move or a positional one? Why?

Is it harder to find a brilliant tactical move or a positional one? Why?

Thanks.for me : a positional move is harder to find

Correct positional moves are much harder for me.

Yes, This questions is about you.🙂

Thanks.

🙂

Thanks

Thank you!

Good Positional Chess, Planning & Strategy Books for Beginners and Beyond...

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/introduction-to-positional-chess-planning-strategy

in the following article, search 'Positional Chess'...

Improving Your Chess - Resources for Beginners and Beyond…https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/improving-your-chess-resources-for-beginners-and-beyond

just out of curiosity, why do you ask?

Thanks🙂

I play a lot of games as a hobby though..but even when I play a serious game like rapid , except for tactical carelessness which is normal at my level( my rapid rating is around 2100)..I feel that my positional understanding is low😔..It is much easier to solve a puzzle that comes from the game of the grandmasters than to find a great positional move..I remember Karpov once ended a years-long fight in the variations with a simple waiting move..

I wanted to know if others are like me?

Thanks.

How positional brilliance can be easily disproven: https://lichess.org/@/DailyInsanity/blog/the-axiom-system-part-4-justification-in-chess/9C9iPyvF (see "A Critique of Justification")

Thanks!

To generalize, positional.

Tactics are understood at every level above the very lowest, but a deep positional brilliancy might require a very subtle understanding of some aspect of the game that only a very strong player will have.

Imagine, for instance, a scenario where a player gives up a material advantage to squash the opponents counterplay and trade down into an evenish looking endgame but one where our hero has assessed the structure as winning for their side.

Thanks, yes..you are right!

Both are hard