Lag here is the WORST
Sort:
I totally agree with these complaints. I’m going to delete the app and play chess somewhere else.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#22
Doesn't it make sense that if lag is only a problem for some people, then the cause must not be the site itself?
Aug 20, 2019
0
#23
DaddyReza wrote:
@bacon I know the site rules. If someone is going to say a particular site has more options to get better we obviously want to know compared to whom they are talking about. I know they don't allow to name other sites, which is hilarious and meaningless in my opinion.
Then send that person a PM for the info.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#24
DaddyReza wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
@bacon I know the site rules. If someone is going to say a particular site has more options to get better we obviously want to know compared to whom they are talking about. I know they don't allow to name other sites, which is hilarious and meaningless in my opinion.
Then send that person a PM for the info.
Oh man! Remove IM from your name.
So you have decided to skip right over my suggestion, and move on to my profile name. What would be the point in changing my profile name, and what does that have to do with my last post?
Aug 20, 2019
0
#25
DaddyReza wrote:
@bacon I know the site rules. If someone is going to say a particular site has more options to get better we obviously want to know compared to whom they are talking about. I know they don't allow to name other sites, which is hilarious and meaningless in my opinion.
There are good reasons for the website with the most active forums to discourage advertising other sites, or even detailed comparisons that show the superiority of chess.com.
Here's one:
In 2003, I was playing correspondence ("daily" here) on a site (I'll call it "tangled" for the sake of discussion) and reading the forums. A post on tangled described another correspondence site that was said to have been created by a disgruntled former member. I decided to see for myself how "bad" that other site was. By the end of 2004, the "bad" site was my main playing site as I found it vastly superior in all respects to tangled, which is was allegedly based upon.
Come 2009, I was playing active correspondence chess on two sites--the "bad" site criticized in the tangled forums, and chess.com. I remained active in both of these until early 2018 when I decided to give correspondence chess a break after twenty-two years of always being on move in one or more ongoing games (dating back to when I sent my moves via postcard).
Aug 20, 2019
0
#26
DaddyReza wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
@bacon I know the site rules. If someone is going to say a particular site has more options to get better we obviously want to know compared to whom they are talking about. I know they don't allow to name other sites, which is hilarious and meaningless in my opinion.
Then send that person a PM for the info.
Oh man! Remove IM from your name.
So you have decided to skip right over my suggestion, and move on to my profile name. What would be the point in changing my profile name, and what does that have to do with my last post?
Why are you stuck on it? No other site was mentioned.Let it go.
I always feel like you are a real IM with that name of yours.
So now we are back to the original question i see.
"DaddyReza wrote: @bacon I know the site rules."
Apparently you don't, or you just chose to ignore them. I will post this gain. Why dont you simply PM the person and ask them what site they are referring to?
Now as far as my profile name. What would change if i did drop the "IM"? Or is that supposed to accomplish something?
Aug 20, 2019
0
#27
DaddyReza wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
@bacon I know the site rules. If someone is going to say a particular site has more options to get better we obviously want to know compared to whom they are talking about. I know they don't allow to name other sites, which is hilarious and meaningless in my opinion.
There are good reasons for the website with the most active forums to discourage advertising other sites, or even detailed comparisons that show the superiority of chess.com.
Here's one:
In 2003, I was playing correspondence ("daily" here) on a site (I'll call it "tangled" for the sake of discussion) and reading the forums. A post on tangled described another correspondence site that was said to have been created by a disgruntled former member. I decided to see for myself how "bad" that other site was. By the end of 2004, the "bad" site was my main playing site as I found it vastly superior in all respects to tangled, which is was allegedly based upon.
Come 2009, I was playing active correspondence chess on two sites--the "bad" site advertised criticized in the tangled forums, and chess.com. I remained active in both of these until early 2018 when I decided to give correspondence chess a break after twenty-two years of always being on move in one or more ongoing games (dating back to when I sent my moves via postcard).
Good point. But this would have worked if their main competitors were small websites which were not popular enough to rank in search engines. But their main competitors show up on the first page on simple search keywords related to chess. I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule.
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
Why don't we all just do what we want, because we don't agree with something!
I find these types of "rule breakers" are ok with it, until it impacts them.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#28
DaddyReza wrote:
I never broke a rule. Stop you bacon.
I didn't say you broke a rule. You were asking another member to break a rule you know is a rule. So you are just as guilty. And all this after you said you know the rules.
Again...
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
Why don't we all just do what we want, because we don't agree with something!
I find these types of "rule breakers" are ok with it, until it impacts them.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#29
DaddyReza wrote:
Lol fake IM just I never mentioned any competitor site so I am not guilty. Don't misrepresent my position. You have a habit of misrepresenting things just like your username.
Again, you are changing subjects without answering the other questions...
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
I will ask again. What does my username have to do with the initial questions?
Aug 20, 2019
0
#30
DaddyReza wrote:
I already answered each question Fake IM.
Where did you answer the questions?
They are not in this post.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#31
DaddyReza wrote:
What can i say? You are truly blessed with sub par comprehension skills.
Nope...you have not addressed any of these questions.
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
Why don't we all just do what we want, because we don't agree with something!
I find these types of "rule breakers" are ok with it, until it impacts them.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#32
DaddyReza wrote:
Be good boy and Don't troll or you seriously are one thick....
Simple truth is, you wont answer the questions.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#33
DaddyReza wrote:
Troll.
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
Why don't we all just do what we want, because we don't agree with something!
I find these types of "rule breakers" are ok with it, until it impacts them.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#34
DaddyReza wrote:
Troll.
What happened in the 24 days since you joined?
24 days ago you agreed to the site rules, and now you don't agree with them?
And is this really a good reason to not follow them? "I feel it's a pointless and an outdated rule. "
Why don't we all just do what we want, because we don't agree with something!
I find these types of "rule breakers" are ok with it, until it impacts them.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#35
Optimissed wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
Be good boy and Don't troll or you seriously are one thick....
Simple truth is, you wont answer the questions.
There you go again, boasting. Let me tell you, I have worse comprehension skills than you. My comprehension skills are so bad that I might have sausages for breakfast tomorrow, and that'll teach you a lesson.
I have no idea what you just wroten.
Aug 20, 2019
0
#36
DaddyReza wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
Be good boy and Don't troll or you seriously are one thick....
Simple truth is, you wont answer the questions.
There you go again, boasting. Let me tell you, I have worse comprehension skills than you. My comprehension skills are so bad that I might have sausages for breakfast tomorrow, and that'll teach you a lesson.
I have no idea what you just wroten.
You never have any idea. No idea man NIM.
I just want to know what happened in 24 days...
Aug 20, 2019
0
#38
Optimissed wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
Be good boy and Don't troll or you seriously are one thick....
Simple truth is, you wont answer the questions.
There you go again, boasting. Let me tell you, I have worse comprehension skills than you. My comprehension skills are so bad that I might have sausages for breakfast tomorrow, and that'll teach you a lesson.
I have no idea what you just wroten.
Now you're calling me rotten! Humbug!
<sniff sniff>
Well....
Aug 20, 2019
0
#39
DaddyReza wrote:
You are no idea man NIM. You will still have no idea after I tell you, just like I did before. @NIMbacon.
You're not going to answer, and i can understand why. You got caught. I have moved on...