Like...
my sis messed up my account

Here are some of the reasons todays [ICFF] top level correspondence chess is stronger than stockfish level. [palindrome]
1. a strong chess player and strong chess engine is stronger than a chess engine alone. The player can direct the chess engine to examine certain lines. A player can also direct the chess engine to ignore certain lines.
2. strong chess engines do not know a whole lot about openings. A strong correspondence player does.
3. a very strong correspondence player can make a long range plan--something even the strongest chess engine cannot do. I could give a couple of examples of this from my own games which were played after I stopped correspondence chess but still played exhibitions.
4. a very strong chess engine cannot quite play positional chess as well as a strong human chess player can. [chess engines are catching up on this]
5. there are probably other reasons which I [with my senility] cannot think of right now.

So this means that I+engine can beat Carlsen+engine. Right?
nope.
Of course not, you are not using good logic here.

So this means that I+engine can beat Carlsen+engine. Right?
Yo Muhammad. What part of "strong player" did you miss in the explanation?

So this means that I+engine can beat Carlsen+engine. Right?
Yo Muhammad. What part of "strong player" did you miss in the explanation?
well for a start he is daydreaming of becoming a GM.

I am not aiming to be a GM now. I just thought I can apply engine use to chess better than Carlsen. :P

I am not aiming to be a GM now. I just thought I can apply engine use to chess better than Carlsen. :P
Carlsen has people who help him. These people are sometimes called "seconds" These people use chess engines often.
Maybe you could apply to be a "second"?

Wow! How much money would I get?!
you must be joking. right?
i thought you will ask "How much will it take to get MC as a trainer!"
Shadaxe is now 584 in blitz!
Been completely poleaxed by the sis.
I'm not laffin!! :(
Exactly. lol... she obliterated the rating.
hey ponz, what is the strength of top level correspondence play? is it stronger than stockfish level?
I have not played top level correspondence chess for decades. It is different now than when I played it.
However, I have played 2 exhibitions on chess.com which had some similiaries to current top level correspondence chess.
To answer your question: Top level correspondence chess [I am talking about ICCF correspondence chess, not chess.co correspondence chess] is quite a bit stronger than than stockfish level. [there are several reasons for this]