Something seems to be wrong with the automatic comments generated at the end of a game. Recently I've noticed I'm getting "Nice comeback win!" for games where I thought I was dominating throughout. Last time this happened I went to Game Analysis and the comment there was "Nice win! You were never in trouble". Sure enough, when I went through the analysis I was never more than 0,1 behind on the evaluation.
Please post an example where that happened.
"ROUGH — One player kept up the pressure."
is what I see when I run the analysis on that game. Which is actually one I've never seen before in all my games. The words are just there to add a bit of a dumbo layer though, to be honest. If people are interested in the computer analysis they look at the move evaluations.
As far as I can tell, if your opponent has a positive, even .01 better than you... for only a single move in the entire game, and you win... it's considered a comeback win.
Which pretty much makes the compliment useless, since even grandmasters frequently swap slight +/- during a game.
I'm curious how komodo would analyse the games between Alpha Chess Zero and Stockfish.
On the most famous game, it supposedly took stockfish several hours to find one of the moves that Alpha Zero played.
I had it in a recent game the person had 8+ points on me and I checkmated him.
Something seems to be wrong with the automatic comments generated at the end of a game. Recently I've noticed I'm getting "Nice comeback win!" for games where I thought I was dominating throughout. Last time this happened I went to Game Analysis and the comment there was "Nice win! You were never in trouble". Sure enough, when I went through the analysis I was never more than 0,1 behind on the evaluation.