1. Chess is also a game of time management. If your opponent flags you in a drawn position, he is the better player because he spent less time to reach an equal position. Is it frustrating? Certainly. But is it fair? Unfortunately, the answer is yes as well.
2. What is it with people thinking their opponents are obligated to accept their rematch? Don't make assumptions that your opponent is a coward. People have things to do sometimes. I suppose you wouldn't know.
3. Public shaming is a form of verbal abuse and if you don't remove the username of your opponent before a moderator reads this thread, your account will likely be muted.
4. 0/10. Your trolling career is NOT looking good.
1. Chess is also a game of fair play. I am not against the concept of winning or losing on time. But there are certain situation when a lot of time is left and players can draw.
2. Nobody is entitled for rematch, but it seems rather suspicious when the player in question played 5 games he won and then retreated as soon as I started winning. Coincidence?
3. This is not abuse, but sharing with the community. However making threats like yours is abuse.
4. Imagine wasting so much time like you for this. Seems like you are the troll here
1. I hate to break it to you but flagging out people in dead drawn positions is fair play. I understand you might not be a fan of it, and neither am I, but sometimes, the situation calls for it.
2. Even if your opponent is "running" from a rematch, he is first of all entitled to that as you pointed out and secondly, perhaps he just decided he has had enough against you and wants to move on to a different opponent. You have no right to make such an assumption.
3. I made no threats, only a warning to you that refraining from deleting the name of your opponent could lead to a mute. You can alert the community falsely without the name of your opponent, no?
4. You've commented on this thread more than I have. You seem to be the one wasting more time here.
I dont see anything wrong in what your opponent did ...