OK, great. Then naming a sport that requires no physical skill should be easy. Baseball? Golf? What about football. No skill required in any of these sports?
"sports don't require physical skill". That's pretty out there. You might starting to lose some support from your own camp when you say things like that.
The definition is very clear. Which is why there is no confusion. Anyone with even a 4th grade education can read the definition. It's NOT my definition. I didn't make it up. The dictionary defines sport as a recreational activity requiring physical skill. It may have little or almost zero exertion. It's the SKILL that makes it a sport, not the amount of energy used.
So when you say it matches the definition you are obviously wrong, or possibly confused. I guess you could try reading it again.
Again, it didn't say physical skill. It said physical exertion. You keep on mixing these up. They are separate from each other. A sport requires physical exertion, but doesn't require physical skill.
Seriously, that's what the definition said.
lol. I'm quite sure you didn't mean to say that. Flumboozled on what you meant to say perhaps. Senior moment. Temporary loss of thought. Maybe all three.
You said, and I quote, "A sport requires physical exertion, but doesn't require physical skill."
Your words. Just out of curiosity, could you name a sport that requires zero physical skill? Since none is required, zero is the threshold. Baseball for example. No physical skill, at all, needed?
He said it doesn't have to have physical skill, not that a sport is not allowed to.
Yes, he said sports dont require physical skill. So naturally I'm curious what sport doesn't require physical skill. I've never heard of such a claim. I'm pretty sure nobody else has either.
I've got to go to bed so I'll try to summarize for you so you can understand. Clearly, you aren't understanding what I'm trying to make you understand, leaving you to draw up conclusions I didn't mean you to assume. You kind of didn't answer to my response....
First of all, I was responding to you saying that chess isn't a sport because it doesn't require physical skill. You, in the that instance, were mixing up the words skill and exertion, leaving you to respond in a rather silly way.
And yes I said sports don't require physical skill. That doesn't mean that sports don't require physical skill, it's just that not all sports require physical skill. In this case, chess. Please don't bend my words. You'll simply drag on the conversation.
Chess is unique. I've interpreted that sports do not require physical skill. They only need to have physical exertion, competitiveness, and an element of skillfulness. Sports, as the definition implies (and says), only require physical exertion, not physical skill. Let me say repeat that. Exertion, not skill.
Let me also repeat what I said earlier. Chess is a rare example of a sport which does not have physical skill as the main element of the game. Baseball, however, relies on the physical traits of competitors. (Chess relies on mental abilities.)
"Yes, he said sports dont require physical skill. So naturally I'm curious what sport doesn't require physical skill. I've never heard of such a claim. I'm pretty sure nobody else has either. "
Chess is a sport which doesn't require physical skill. And yes, I did say sports don't require physical skill as a trait to make them a sport, but physical skill is just the main element of those sports. Chess is a different case.