Players with a rating under 900 shouldn't be allowed to play chess


I would vehemently reject this thread as I was U900 for 1 year and in that 1 year I was genuinely reading books and only after early-2022 did I cross that barrier. I am currently 1250~ ish and if chess.com had banned U900 players I would have never been able to improve to this extent. So I disagree with the thread above.
I guess some people take chess too seriously. For me it's just a board game. For the ones that take it too seriously, they most likely are lacking in other aspects of life.
Wow, woolly and I actually agree on something. I guess there really is a first for everything. Never thought that would happen. Perhaps cats aren't that bad after all. I still prefer dogs though.

I would vehemently reject this thread as I was U900 for 1 year and in that 1 year I was genuinely reading books and only after early-2022 did I cross that barrier. I am currently 1250~ ish and if chess.com had banned U900 players I would have never been able to improve to this extent. So I disagree with the thread above.
First of all, I want to vehemently congratulate you for reaching 1250 and kindly celebrate with you all the time and effort you invested to achieve this incredible and unbelievable goal in chess. Congratulations !!!!?@&π×÷¶∆

if it didn't go below 900 then how would more people learn?
Puzzles, tactic trainer, lessons, tutorials, practise vs bots...

I find this topic sensitive because when i started playing i lost all my rating I'm still at 400 even tho i win 95% of my games i can easily beat a 1000-1900