13093 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Why is endgame study so important? Endgame study is important because it frees up your game. Without it, you are hesitant to reach even winning endgames because you are unsure of them. This can lead to reckless middle game play. Checkmate or bust is a good term for it. Before I learned basic endgame theory, I would attack, attack and attack some more because I knew if I entered even a Rook and King versus a lone King, I couldn't handle it and my score suffered for it.
Today I want to talk about a couple of useful Endgame themes that will show up in your games from time to time and how to view these positions. These are examples from my own game played on www.chess.com.
When you are up in material, do not offer your opponent a simplifying exchange at the expense of your position. Your opponent, if he/she is good, will decline it and improve their position. This is a great way to lose a won game. Instead you should strive to make use of your extra material by using it to attack or create other weaknesses on the board. You want to bring your opponent to his knees and beg you for the exchange.
The next position in the game brings up a very useful theme of placing a piece below that of passed pawn so that if the king captures the piece, the pawn promotes.
Having a piece in the endgame, en prise below the passed pawn occurs at the highest levels of chess, not just at the amateur level.
To sum up:(1) A passed pawn is great asset. Do your best to calculate a sequence to promote the pawn. Failing that, use the pawn to create other weaknesses on the board while the opposition is forced to handle the passed pawn. Do not defend the pawn at the expense of weakening your position or losing the initiative when you can recreate another weakness on the board and simplify the position.
(2) Placing a piece below a passed pawn works just as well as protected pass pawns. The position can babysit itself while you look to create havoc elsewhere on the board.
(3) When you are ahead in material, do not fall into the trap of simplifying at the expense of your position. You should use your extra material to gain advantages to the point that your opponent is forced to exchange to relieve his weaknesses.
Very true! Let's add a bishop to the problem and improve black's postion based on that bishop and see how black can take advange with a more trying postion!
Now granted, a lot of times the bishop or knight would do well in similar positions and black's king has an improved position, but notice how black is able to slowly improve his postion with his king and other pawns while the black king must play babysitter to the g2 pawn. Only when black can't improve his postion any more, does he release the knight from guard duty.
Is this the best line? Can you give some lines where white attacks the g pawn with the bishop?
Thanks for the posts. I really enjoy studies about the endgame.
The problem with taking the g2 pawn with the bishop (in this position) is that when the full exchange of pieces happens, the king is too far away from the a-file to prevent the black a pawn from Queening.
The position I set up in the comments section is meant to be a winning position to show how the concept mentioned in the article might work in a even material game. It is up to the player to decide whether to employ the techique in the position he is playing. He or she must determine if the techinique is sound by calculating out the moves.
Joey: I think it would be a great addition to the post if you can show us one of your advanced games (or maybe a hypothetical position) where you create those types of advantages and/or exploit them. Thanks for your continued input.
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Elubas a few minutes ago
Can anyone help me analyze this game?
by slaysicilian a few minutes ago
My new board is here!
by JonThePawn a few minutes ago
$200 to spend
by RussBell 2 minutes ago
Isn't It Impossible to Compare Players From Different Eras?
by defenserulz 8 minutes ago
System against white (french or stonewall dutch)
by slaysicilian 9 minutes ago
How black and white are assigned?
by 0110001101101000 10 minutes ago
What if you saw more than the board?
by Rob3rtJamesFischer 11 minutes ago
Tired of sandbagging players
by lutak22 15 minutes ago
Largest Numbers of moves played in a blitz match$$$
by Destroyer_Mark_1420 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!