INVENTING A NEW OPENING
Sort:
Chess is an art, WE CAN invent, create, or modify our own opening and principles behind it. It just require something like a creative mind. In this forum, you are free to comment your opening
It's not new but I play the bongcloud in actual games sometimes (as a joke) lol
Reading is an art. This forum is for endgames not for openings.
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2022-04-19"]
[White "Intermediate"]
[Black "Zoli121212"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Termination "Zoli121212 won by checkmate"]
1. d4 d6 2. c4 Nd7 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nb5 a6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Qa4 Bg7 7. Ne4 Nf6 8. f3 O-O
9. dxc5 Nxe4 10. fxe4 Nxc5 11. Qa3 Be6 12. Bd2 Nxe4 13. Qb4 Qc7 14. Nf3 Nxd2 15.
Nxd2 Rfc8 16. Rd1 Bxc4 17. a4 a5 18. Qxc4 Qxc4 19. Nxc4 Rxc4 20. b4 Rxb4 21. e3
Rxa4 22. Kf2 Rc8 23. Bd3 Rc3 24. Rc1 Rxd3 25. Ke2 Rc3 26. Rxc3 Bxc3 27. Rc1 Bb2
28. Rc7 Rb4 29. Rc8+ Kg7 30. h3 a4 31. Rc7 e6 32. Rd7 d5 33. Kf3 a3 34. Re7 a2
35. Re8 a1=Q 36. Ke2 Qa2 37. g4 Be5+ 38. Kf3 Rb2 39. g5 Rf2+ 40. Kg4 Rg2+ 41.
Kh4 Qf2# 0-1
I honestly think this is pretty solid. Ofc there could be improvements with the move order, but I think its pretty good. I call it the Carpathian Defense.
Wait, I thiught this would paste the game. How can I paste the game?
I'm black, played against a 1200 engine (it sucks I know). Name of the opening is Carpathian Defense
Apr 18, 2022
0
#9
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
looks interesting, but I don't know why the computer when nb5, advancing would lead to a benoni-like position
Apr 18, 2022
0
#10
goodboy199 wrote:
Chess is an art, WE CAN invent, create, or modify our own opening and principles behind it. It just require something like a creative mind. In this forum, you are free to comment your opening
I'm not sure whether Chess is art, i would rather say chess is science. Results in Science can be very beautiful, like a work of art : Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics, Euler-Lagrange equations, differential geometric formulation of gauge theory including gravity, Legendre transform between state fonctions in physical chemistry...
Art is (almost) *purely* esthetical with minimal elements of rationality.Science is the converse: mainly based on rationality, and there can emerge aspects of beauty, esthetics, but rather as a result (although sometimes/often also as motivation and guide), not as the determinating factor and/or justification, as in art.
Don't you think Chess is rather science than art?
Also because of counterplay. In art you should not be guided by how it will be accepted by others (else I consider it as prostitution ... — although some "artists" aim at pleasing—or shocking—their public). In chess, it's *all* about winning, i.e., "frustrating" your opponent, in some sense.
Apr 18, 2022
0
#11
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
6.Qa4 is a total blunder (after already losing a tempo earlier...), the position is lost from there on, against a good player (6...cxd and -3 against white). You should test the opening against a stronger engine.
Apr 18, 2022
0
#12
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
After 3...c5 you are almost 1.5 behind white. I think the correct idea to implement this idea is the pterodactyl defense (do the queen side pawn pushes after g6, Nf6) which i like to play with quite some success.
1.d4 d5 and I always used to play 2.Nf3 that's how game nature
Apr 21, 2022
0
#14
There is an opening I’ve “invented” and I use with good results:
The plan of this opening is to try to punish 2…e6. Basically, black’s bishops don’t have a lot of options other than fianchetto.
PLAYERIII wrote:
There is an opening I’ve “invented” and I use with good results:
The plan of this opening is to try to punish 2…e6. Basically, black’s bishops don’t have a lot of options other than fianchetto.
This has been played in a handful of master games
Creativity in the opening is a common trope in this site. An infamous example:
But just one of a long series...
https://www.chess.com/forum/search?keyword=%22invented+an+opening%22
Be actually creative and invent an endgame.
There are a few lines I made myself but they are not too far of the beaten path and I'm not trying to improve them so much as understand them better than the opponent. For example I play a a4 b5 c4 d3 e2 g3 pawn structure in the reti advance that the computer thinks I have given all advantage away but i win in that line more than when they transpose to say QGD because they don't every play the position and i do all the time. I think chessbase + chessable will make some of this more viable i just started trying to upload my stuff into chessbase today to paste back over to chessable to help memorize
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
PLAYERIII wrote:
There is an opening I’ve “invented” and I use with good results:
The plan of this opening is to try to punish 2…e6. Basically, black’s bishops don’t have a lot of options other than fianchetto.
This has been played in a handful of master games
After d5 Black equalizes. If you want to avoid Bb4, then just play Nf3.
PLAYERIII wrote:
There is an opening I’ve “invented” and I use with good results:
The plan of this opening is to try to punish 2…e6. Basically, black’s bishops don’t have a lot of options other than fianchetto.
Black can play either 3...d5 or 3...c5, aiming for QGD or Tarrasch. In either case, the move a2-a3 is of limited practical use (although not useless).
