When is it better to underpromote?

Sort:
RewanDemontay
Arisktotle wrote:

Why not post #66 as puzzles, RewanDemontay? They are nice problems!

 

They aren’t really meant to be problems so much so as economy attempts.

glamdring27

If only people got more prize money for faster checkmates, or they mattered in any way shape or form!

Bulacano

Faster mates are important in premove situations when low on time

Arisktotle

Fast mates score 1 point in chess games. Slow mates score 1 point in chess games.

Fast mates score 1 point in problems. Slow mates score 0 points in problems.

See the difference?

glamdring27

The difference implies problems are spurious since games are what matter!

Ziryab
glamdring27 wrote:

The difference implies problems are spurious since games are what matter!

 

Truth matters. Games exist only so that you can develop your vision for problems.

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

just s/t i wanted2say. i feel its mean (cheeky) to underpromote in a totally won game. just getta Q for gawts sake !

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

ah-ha.   lol ! 

Ziryab
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:

just s/t i wanted2say. i feel its mean (cheeky) to underpromote in a totally won game. just getta Q for gawts sake !

 

When it's past time to resign, cheeky is what you get.

RewanDemontay


Here’s a cheeky game that I played awhile ago: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/229154698

 

 

acgusta2

In this game I was able to checkmate using only my bishops without needing the help of my king.

glamdring27

Promoting to Bishops just for the sake of it isn't 'better to underpromote' though.  It's just choosing to make a game last longer!

ponz111

I played a game in the Ponziani opening where it was essential to under promote to a knight to win.

 

UltimateCreatorofBob

I've seen knight promotions in puzzles, but never in a real game.

Ziryab
UltimateCreatorofBob wrote:

I've seen knight promotions in puzzles, but never in a real game.

 

 

Ziryab
freenelsonmandela wrote:

32 Nc5 all the way!

 

Of course, I should have seen that.

SunTzu_56

only underpromote when it directly places your opponent in check, i think.

wollyhood
tlay80 wrote:

The only time I've ever had occasion to underpromote to a knight in a game wasn't to give check -- it was to *avoid* getting checked:

I was about to resign, when I noticed b8=N!

 

I wish I could report that I managed to hold the draw, but even with the underpromotion, I couldn't quite save it.  Still, it bought me an extra ten or twenty moves.

Have had a good look at that game you laid out in that post: https://www.chess.com/a/NcGHkSSJy7gi

and I think I understand the situation, can I just check: you were hoping to stay out of harms way for 50 more moves? Is that the basic idea, the best you could realistically hope for in that position?

KiNg_oF_cLaShErs

UltimateCreatorofBob wrote:

I've seen knight promotions in puzzles, but never in a real game.

Aatish01012010
Ziryab wrote:
UltimateCreatorofBob wrote:

I've seen knight promotions in puzzles, but never in a real game.

 

 

I've did it before