Those of us who have spent our lives studying endgames seriously, aren't about to let all that work be thrown out the window, to please a few weekend wood-pushers who haven't put 2% of the work into endgames, we have
Actually, I think it's quite funny that you spent so much of your life studying such a worthless concept. Chess is shit btw
The ruling of a draw for stalemates is just a way to encourage players to be precise. It may take so much effort just to learn a small bit of extra endgame technique, but it definitely is a rewarding process. The rules for stalemate are finally changed to the current state, having been ruled as wins, losses and draws at different points of time in the past (of course, I was not old enough to have experienced the outcomes of wins and losses for stalemates).
Of course though, real life situations are different (you will not get rewarded, other than staying alive, for dodging continuous enemy attacks). By the way, in other games such as chinese chess, stalemate is a win for the stalemating player. Not sure about other games.
Thank you for addressing my question and the answer still makes no sense to me. If the King cannot move then they lose. The rules of the game are flawed.
If you play 43. Rg5+ , Kf6 is forced and then all you'd have to do is play 44. Qf4# ....