Is Fischer the right choice though? Might be hard to grasp his genius.
Usual classics that are recommended for studying are Capablanca, Rubinstein and Alekhine.
Personally, I find Alekhine quite hard to follow sometimes, but Botvinnik on the other hand is pretty logical.
Is Fischer the right choice though? Might be hard to grasp his genius.
Usual classics that are recommended for studying are Capablanca, Rubinstein and Alekhine.
Personally, I find Alekhine quite hard to follow sometimes, but Botvinnik on the other hand is pretty logical.
I totally get your point. But I can't help it, I've chosen Fischer for this journey.
Adding here that Kramnik's recommendation to his students was to study Smyslov's games (as being harmoniously balanced in terms of dynamics, strategy, defense, attack, etc).
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I'm currently studying Fischer's games.
I'm going to share with you whatever I save in my dossier.
All puzzles require that you play through these samples, trying to guess what Fischer has moved in the game.
Through repetition/ memorization, you will be able to emulate (at least, partially) Fischer's style & incorporate it into your games. It will also help you to understand planning, activity, coordination, intuitively.
N.B. Samples are blunder-free. Nevertheless, some moves are weaker, from an engine perspective, in order to illustrate human play/ initiative.
Enjoy!