playing kings gambit as beginner

Sort:
patin4
WayOfTheJoker schreef:
patin4 wrote:
WayOfTheJoker schreef:

 

nice trap. But there are many as well for black and white?

Here is one for black:

 
 
 

 

yes thats why you defend this line with te knight as wihite, but this knigt can be attacked by al little of pawn moves from black?

WayOfTheJoker
patin4 wrote:
WayOfTheJoker schreef:
patin4 wrote:
WayOfTheJoker schreef:

 

nice trap. But there are many as well for black and white?

Here is one for black:

 
 
 

 

yes thats why you defend this line with te knight as wihite, but this knigt can be attacked by al little of pawn moves from black?

I almost got a stroke trying to understand your sentence, but is this what you mean?

 

25GSchatz22

King's Gambit is interesting for both sides. I wish it wasn't so forcing though

patin4
25GSchatz22 schreef:

King's Gambit is interesting for both sides. I wish it wasn't so forcing though

yes that,s the thing every move must be right from move 3 or so, that is different in other openings?

mpaetz
patin4 wrote

Yes, i understand what you are trying to say. I reconsider my comment. I am not playing it anymore because of what you are saying, maybe sometimes as surprise. Which opening do you recommend white must study after e4 and e5?

     As a beginner you don't need to decide now what the best opening is. Try different ones. Yes, you will lose more often to players with greater opening knowledge, but your improved understanding of the game is more important in the long run than winning a few rating points from other weak players.

     The Italian game is more solid and leads to positions where general principles carry more weight than all-out attacks. And if you enjoy risky gambits you can vary your play with the Evans Gambit. It's also somewhat unsound but lets you have the initiative and go for the mating attack if you like that sort of game.

patin4
mpaetz schreef:
patin4 wrote

Yes, i understand what you are trying to say. I reconsider my comment. I am not playing it anymore because of what you are saying, maybe sometimes as surprise. Which opening do you recommend white must study after e4 and e5?

     As a beginner you don't need to decide now what the best opening is. Try different ones. Yes, you will lose more often to players with greater opening knowledge, but your improved understanding of the game is more important in the long run than winning a few rating points from other weak players.

     The Italian game is more solid and leads to positions where general principles carry more weight than all-out attacks. And if you enjoy risky gambits you can vary your play with the Evans Gambit. It's also somewhat unsound but lets you have the initiative and go for the mating attack if you like that sort of game.

i never heard of it... Thanks, look into in it.  But i don t like games till move 10, lets develop some peaces and protect everything....

patin4
pfren schreef:
patin4 έγραψε:

But i don t like games till move 10, lets develop some peaces and protect everything....

 

Then obviously chess is not a game for you.

Ok, you have made your point, start with an solid based opening not to theoretiacal, that advise i take, but the problem is, its a game for me. Reason, because i enjoy it so much, yes i know i am still a beginner, 1100 in rapid, but also 400's enjoy the game, it does makes no difference, 400, 800, 1200, 1600 It doesnt make a difference everyone at their own level, when you are so good as you, then maybe you see chess as a totally different game then i, nevertheless i enjoy playing it and it is my game, thats also the reason i like certain gambits, i dont know. i do take your advice nevertheless serious and look into italian.