ExploringWA wrote:
A Knight will always jump over a rank or file, and land on the opposite color from its starting point?
It'll always land on the opposite color, yes.
Delete
Sort:
Dec 11, 2020
0
#23
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Dec 11, 2020
0
#24
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Three spirals and a backflip on it’s way to its new square? Why limit it to such boring terms as L? 3 clockwise spirals away from the board at approximately 90 degrees.
Dec 11, 2020
0
#25
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Which would be the same thing as "jumping" an occupied square.
Dec 11, 2020
0
#26
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Which would be the same thing as "jumping" an occupied square.
Like these bikes jumping over cars?
Dec 11, 2020
0
#27
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Which would be the same thing as "jumping" an occupied square.
Like these bikes jumping over cars?
I'm saying in theory it's the exact same thing. Whether the knight slides through an occupied square or jumps over an occupied square is irrelevant. It's still going through the square regardless.
Dec 11, 2020
0
#28
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Which would be the same thing as "jumping" an occupied square.
Like these bikes jumping over cars?
I'm saying in theory it's the exact same thing. Whether the knight slides through an occupied square or jumps over an occupied square is irrelevant. It's still going through the square regardless.
From absolutely idiotic to irrelevant. Progress.
Dec 11, 2020
0
#29
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
autobunny wrote:
TheRealZBird wrote:
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.
The knight slides through on the square perimeters.
Which would be the same thing as "jumping" an occupied square.
Like these bikes jumping over cars?
I'm saying in theory it's the exact same thing. Whether the knight slides through an occupied square or jumps over an occupied square is irrelevant. It's still going through the square regardless.
From absolutely idiotic to irrelevant. Progress.
It's the same thing. There was no progress needed to be made. Keep trying.
I think it's absolutely idiotic to say that a knight does not "jump" over other pieces. There's literally no other way to describe it.