i can defeat high elo bots but not low rated humans

Plus i play moderately good sometimes and then I just play like a toddler who got air for a brain

Actually I kinda defeated sven in the first try

Nelson took two.

Bots are that stupid? Why did chess.com give that kind of elo? Thanks, I thought I was dumb. That really makes me feel good

Cuz i ain't as dumb as I thought, playing good in one place and becoming a toddler in another place. It may sound a bit weird but knowing that I am consistent in my level of playing is more comforting than in the situation I thought I was in

Bots are generally overrated. Their rating is not a real rating (it doesn't change as they win or lose), it's just a number written there. It can be anything, but more often than not it's several hundred points higher than it "should" be.

That said, your games don't give me the vibe that you can beat 1300+ bots easily.

Look at your last game:

htthttps://www.chess.com/game/live/141506599704_saatatya&move=5

On move 7 you won a queen, on move 14 you lost a queen (your queen was attacked and you played a random move in 3 seconds).

You were completely winning at around move 30. You were up a rook and a piece with more than 6 minutes on the clock, and a couple of moves later you were lost.

Use your time and think. Pay attention to the game and try to stop making these 1-move blunders. Nothing else matters.

Thanks guys

You can defeat high elo bots but not humans because a 1300 elo bot plays like 900 elo human

Bots are over inflated by 1000 elo more. I beat Paul Morphy bot and I'm only 1400 (peaked 1600).

I've been playing chess for a long time! Mainly on other sites, and I've been improving a lot. About a year ago I reached 2000 elo, and I realized that it's nothing impressive. the 2000 elo make stupid mistakes, I believe that many of them did not deserve to be in this elo, they arrived in some unfair way. It seems strange and arrogant to say this, but tell me, how does a 2000 elo play the elephant gambit in rapid? Or why do so many 2000 elo players play the hippo opening? It's disappointing, The most disappointing thing is that you follow basic opening concepts and managed to equalize an ending with a strong player, and in this ending he doesn't even know about king opposition!🤣, Bobby Fischer was more than transcendent when he invented 960 chess, a variant in which bad players cannot play, "it's very easy to memorize, the difficult thing is to play", A long time ago I played against a guy here on chess.com, he had 2400 elo, but he played like a 1500! In his game history there were several fake accounts that donated rating to him, I don't know if it's allowed to disclose his nickname, he was an American, these forms of cheating are ridiculous and end up with competition and inflate the site. What's happening to "advanced" chess players? With the arrival of engines, have they gotten worse or are they only reaching this level by cheating? If you are an average player, don't be afraid, anyone can be a 2,000 player these days🫵

1. Ive been struggling to get to 2000 (peak was 1999)

This is a classic issue because bots are programmed to be predictably bad, often making a few huge, illogical blunders that are easy to punish. Low-rated humans, on the other hand, are unpredictably bad; they create chaos with aggressive, unsound attacks that are very tricky to navigate if you're expecting the more straightforward play of a computer.