I’ll never win

I am a beginner, and I think if I keep practicing, it might "click."

Unless you're a truly gifted there are no shortcuts.. . You will begin to remember and recognize patterns etc with repetition repetition repetition. Work the puzzles thousands and thousands of puzzles. They will teach you scenarios to look for for capturing pieces and making mates

Take a break from chess and come back in about a week, you're probably tilting.

[Abuse removed; DS]

This is a game, it’s meant to be enjoyed, if you are struggling to learn to play it reach out to the community for help. I’d be happy to play unrated daily games with you and discuss chess concepts, explain ideas of the positions and how to understand what is going on in positions and recommend study materials if you want. Just let me know.

@1

Do not focus on winning, focus on not losing first.
Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it.

Don't say that, it's normal for 100's.

use internet for your specific issue maybe even ask ai for advice on your lackings

"I suck at everything I try to do."

God forbid!

Hold it!

We'd love to help, but "helping" without proper diagnosis is called malpractice, thus:

https://www.chesspersonality.com/

Also, please tell us a bit about your chess style. And if possible, tell your age (lots of things are age-related).

Start by learning the basics like what should be the motive of opening , how do I achieve it . Don't leave your piece hanging and capture the opponent's hanging piece . Understand the basic principles , practice and then work your way up

I’m 14(m) and I done really know what a chess style is, I usually just try to get my opponents pieces off the board but most of the time idk what I’m doing.

No live opponents for now. Play against the computer, but don't be distracted by all those bots with pictures - play against engine 1 for now. There are no time constraints so slow right down and really think about it. When you can beat engine 1 in 3 out of 4 games, move up to engine 2 and so on. You will get better. It will take time, be patient.

Best regards, young man. Thank you for replying.

"I usually just try to get my opponent pieces off the board"

Me too.

Please make sure you know these patterns by heart:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkmate_pattern

White:
1. c4 with a Botvinnik Setup.
Pros: Grabs space, your opponent doesn't have a ready-made reply to this, has attacking prospects.
Cons: You have a hole in the position for an enemy horse to occupy.

2.d4 c4
Pros: Positionally choking for the opponent. Solid.
Cons: You'll face many different openings.

Black:
Against e4 - Scandinavian Qa5.
Pros: Psychologically devastating for White. Attacking prospects to spare. Good practical results.
Cons: Somewhat dubious.

Against e4 - French Defense. Pros: Tried & True. Psychologically irritating for White, the solidity can ensure your pieces are in the correct places, and you have attacking prospects.

Cons: You need to know some sidelines. I left it because I felt my king wasn't safe enough, maybe I was wrong.

Against e4 - Sicilian Dragon with h7-h5 (followed by h5-h4) before the opponent can play Bh6 (stopping his attack in its tracks)
Pros: Slow buildup, so the attack is strong.

Cons: Many sidelines. But to most of them, you can just use the same Dragon setup. The "fearsome" Smith-Morra can be transposed into a harmless little Alapin.

I made a study on those sidelines:

https://lichess.org/study/7Tq6H2s2

Against d4.
I'll share my dilemmas with you:
If I play d5...
---If my opponent plays c4 then Great! I play QGA! (see GM Finegold's hour-long lecture on it).
---If my opponent plays Bf4, I'm in boredom land. (non of us have Anything, that's just a draw)

If I play Nf6...
---If my opponent plays c4, I have less space, it will be hard to reach a good position.
---If my opponent plays Bf4, then Great! I'll play d6 and, objectively, a double fianchetto with c5 is what the pros are doing. (You have other options: Old Indian Defense, and Czech Defense, Slav-Indian - c6).
Nf6, d6 c6, Nbd7, Qc7,e5 when possible is a fine setup, your pieces have room to move, and your opponent's attack is restrained).

My attacking strategy:
Basically, you need 3 pieces to attack the enemy king (on the h2/h7/a2/a7 square, if he castled, they usually do). Two pieces to attack the square (h2,h7,a2,a7), and one other piece to eliminate the defender of those squares, or to sac. that piece on one or two pawns - the g and h pawns guarding the opponent's king, to open things up. You can also provoke them h and g pawns to move forward - when the king isn't around them, they're weaker.

* By the time you'll reach about 18, your way of looking at things will change, you'll have more options, and you'll feel a whole lot better. [10-20 is changing from child to adult, please hold on]

Do you do chess puzzles? Do you watch videos of top rated players as they explain their thinking? How about reading a good chess book or two+?

I bet you're much more capable than you realize. Whenever you lose a game, stop and do puzzles for 1/2 an hour or more. Take a few breaths before you make a move, and look closer at why you're picking that spot to move. Maybe it's a trap. As frustrating as it is, losing can help make you better.

I was stuck for awhile but I found a combination of doing puzzles and analyzing my games afterwards helped. Instead of just clicking to the next one after a loss, use the engine and try to figure out why it's recommending a particular move, or why the move played was bad. I ended up spending 5-10 minutes per puzzle figuring it out, but it was worth it.

Play the computer, starting at the lowest level, Martin, and gradually work your way up. It helped me, I'm no Bobby Fischer, but I'm 10 times better than when I started playing.

i feel your pain -- i too suck--all the time -- but take heart -- some people just excel at this game without really trying and some like me anyways just suck -- studies have proven that people with analytical thinking or math type people do really well at chess without trying or at least the start much sooner at doing better -- also artistic people also do well at chess -- they take longer but do after time do as well as the math types slowly gaining instead of bouncing up the charts as the math types do -- once you figure that winning or losing will come whether your either types and just enjoy the pleasure of the game the moves you win at the dumb moves you get hammered with and just see the game as a way to make time stand still for 5/10/30 minutes even all day if that wets your whistle-- then you will enjoy the game for what it is a pleasure time not a competition-- think of it as painting, people paint to enjoy the experience not to get their painting sold for millions or in a museum ,once you accept that and realize that for every person here that has a score of 1500 and up there has to be 100's of people who have scores of 100-150 like me to make that possible

just enjoy the game and try to improve but don't sweat it you are in good company down here at the bottom

The best advice you've gotten so far is to play the bots.Give yourself the most lenient game guidelines (takeback, etc.) and choose the lowest rated bot you can. Then play slowly, thinking about which of your pieces is in danger, which of the bot's pieces "he's" left hanging, etc. I see that, right now, you seem to be a free member, which is quite understandable at your age, but do as many puzzles as you can and go over your games after you've finished playing them so see where you went right and wrong. Also, you may want to check out lichess.org where all of the features are free. There you can do unlimited puzzles, and you can get a computer analysis of your games. 
All of this should result in a gradual improvement over time, but we all have our ceilings, and nothing is going to change that. I am 72, and I doubt I'll ever break 1500 on chess.com--even with a great deal of study and application. On the other hand, I just read on here of an 8 year old boy who recently beat 5 GMs in blitz and rapid. Go figure.
Above all, have fun with the game, no matter the level you play at. You can play over GM games, read articles about the great players, watch hundreds of interesting and instructive videos on YouTube, etc. I have been playing since I was your age, have not improved markedly in 60 years, and yet love every minute of it.