My logic vs. engine (analysis)

Sort:
Shovi88

Hello!
(dont know is this the right place for such a topic - but I dont see any other... sorry if I'm wrong tongue.png )

The game was ~850 rating.

[edit: i didn't mark opponent move - he/she played Knight e4)

Engine say that is better to defend Knight e2, but my logic was: at this level opponent could go to f2 and FORK my rock/queen, so i decided to develop my Queen (1. +1 support for Knight on c3 and +1 d5 pawn; 2. attacking opponents Knight right away).

Even if he "just" exchange the Knights i preffer to have dubbled pawn on "C" than to move my King if he go f2.

What do You think, people? wink.png

Martin_Stahl
Shovi88 wrote:

Hello!
(dont know is this the right place for such a topic - but I dont see any other... sorry if I'm wrong )

The game was ~850 rating.

[edit: i didn't mark opponent move - he/she played Knight e4)

Engine say that is better to defend Knight e2, but my logic was: at this level opponent could go to f2 and FORK my rock/queen, so i decided to develop my Queen (1. +1 support for Knight on c3 and +1 d5 pawn; 2. attacking opponents Knight right away).

Even if he "just" exchange the Knights i preffer to have dubbled pawn on "C" than to move my King if he go f2.

What do You think, people?

There's no threat of Nxf2; the king can just take it.

Shovi88
Martin_Stahl wrote:

There's no threat of Nxf2; the king can just take it.

I know, but i prefer not to move King (so i cant castle) + lost pawn and let my whole centre open...