It does improve your longer game!
Yes Mr. 489 rapid, we trust in your teachings master.
In all seriousness, I’m not one to sh#t on lower rated players, but taking advice from someone that can’t break 600 rapid is akin to asking a baby who only recently learned how to walk about how to become a marathon runner.
No one pays attention to the opinion of the baby, because they can scarcely grasp what a marathon even is!
Actually, the forum is about Bullet and I am currently 629. Maybe think before you speak next time, could help. You may not look like how you sound. : )
Since your reading comprehension evidently matches your comprehension of chess, let me walk you through nice and slow.
This thread is about how bullet improves your play in longer time controls.
You are awful at longer time controls, despite playing plenty of bullet, so your very existence disproves the premise of your thread.
The fact that this needs to be explained to you is sad but unsurprising.
Oh and “You may not look like how you sound” isn’t a coherent statement in case you didn’t realize.
Either English isn’t your first language or you are mentally impaired.
Please utilize your two remaining neurons to formulate a post that doesn’t make yourself look like a clown, before posting reply.
It will save what little remains of your credibility.
Every time I think you’ve said the most idiotic thing possible, you post another comment and one up yourself.
Do what makes you want to play that game again. If it is bullet, be it.
There is some controversy about the actual value of bullet for improving your game and indeed many good players has a lot of contempt for this kind of chess. But I also know personally a FM who has played more than 200 000 bullet games. He thinks that bullet is real chess and that very high skilled players (maybe world class to be honest) can produce good games with a very low error rate in that time controls. So where lies the truth?
It seems also that youth love bullet and elders don't like it very much.