Preferred response to Wayward Queen Attack

I play the Sicilian Defense (1... c4) against 1. e4, and my preferred response is e6 (discovering a defense of the pawn by the dark-squared bishop, followed by Nf6 (developing with gain of tempo).
Note that the e6 pawn blocks Scholar's Mate because the bishop is prevented from attacking f7.

I prefer second option, that will get us the initiative. However if you don't like to sacrifice your pieces then you might choose first option, but then you will be playing a little passive. (Unless you kick the queen, ofc)

Neither. E6 or Nf6 for the first move stops the attack from happening in the first place.
Why would you want to stop that from happening? If your opponent likes 2. Qh5, you should definitely invite it with e5 on the first move, and enjoy your superior game.

You are underestimating the Kiddie countergambit for sure. Even if white defends properly, black has some compensation. And if white does not defend properly (which is much more likely in a low level blitz game), white just gets crushed.

You are underestimating the Kiddie countergambit for sure. Even if white defends properly, black has some compensation. And if white does not defend properly (which is much more likely in a low level blitz game), white just gets crushed.
My opponent straight-up hung their queen when I used the Kiddie countergambit. That was an easy win

Both approaches are fine, and you can also add another couple of moves, like (1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 Nc6 3.Bc4) Qe7, and (1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 Nc6 3.Bc4) g6 4.Qf3 f5!?
Or perhaps you have an alternate response? What is your preference?