The way I see it, when my rating falls, it is not a bad thing. It is rather simply me reverting to the mean, to the rating where I naturally belong based on my aptitude and willingness to learn. I know and accept that I suck, and I lack the willpower or tenacity to improve beyond, say, 850 without stressing myself out to the point of quitting chess. (Which I did for a bit)
Hey, think of it this way. While improving is a worthy goal for any player, it is okay to just to play for fun even if that means wallowing in the sub 1000 range forever, and hey, every time you lose, your opponents tend to get easier too.
I do not think you can stay at 1000 for ever IF you play rapid and IF you take the time to THINK on every move.
At one point IF you learn one opening for white and one for black you should be able to win "easily" 20 games in a row against everyone under 1250 on this site.
Because they ALL blunder at one point in their first 30-35 move.
Of course to beat them all you need to be a real 1350 elo at least because they are mostly ALL 1200-1250 ELO.
Can it be done in 3 months by playing 4 games every day or in 3 years that depend on you! learn some tactics and some end game too.
spending a few days in the 900 league i just observed that the 900 league is much better than it was
a few weeks ago, full of "new" members that play better than the 1100 league