Can You Teach Me How to Move the Horsey Thing?

Sort:
Avatar of AyushBlundersAgain

I forgot how. Although my friend 1e41-0 did respond "Neigh." This provided a huge breakthrough in my query

Avatar of AyushBlundersAgain

I hate you.

Avatar of blueemu

This'll get it moving:

Avatar of Titled_Patzer

The Knight does NOT jump, ever.

Careful examination reveals it's true movement ...

The Knight moves One square in either a vertical or horizontal direction (along a file or rank) -

and then moves One square diagonally, away from it's original square. 

I hope this clears up this nonsense about horses jumping over squares, "L" patterns or one and two step dances.

Avatar of blueemu

So if there are pieces on all four of the vertically and horizontally adjacent squares, the Horse can't move?

That's news to me.

Avatar of Titled_Patzer

The Knight is able to move through the occupied 1st rank or file square, to the 1st diagonal square away from it's original square. It does not "Jump" over those squares, but rather through them.

Avatar of blueemu

It just creeps stealthily past the piece occupying that square?

So "Knight" is a misnomer... they should be called "Ninjas".

Avatar of Titled_Patzer

This is the Knight's unique quality, the ability to move through occupied squares. As is clearly evident, it does not "Jump" over squares. This is rather an archaic notion. The Knight combines a one move rank or file move with a one square diagonal move - in a single move.

Avatar of Titled_Patzer

Well , "Jumping over" a piece seems rather strange, does it not? Yes, it stealthily moves through the square, as if untouched.

Avatar of blueemu

No wonder the algebraic notation is Nf3... that's Ninja to f3!

Avatar of autobunny

For the real heart wrenching story why knights move the way they do. 

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/the-sad-tale-of-the-pawn

Avatar of blueemu
IronIC_U wrote:

Those forking knights.  Nothing is worse than when your opponent wins with a forking knight, especially when he’d been forking you all night long.

there’s no better fork than what I call the golden fork.  That’s when your knight forks not only both your king & queen, but a rook too, on the way out the door...

From one of my over-the-board tournament games, about 35 years ago:

 

Avatar of blueemu

It's that "Knight forks King, Queen and Rook" thing.

1. Bxe5 Qxe5 2. Qxd8+ Kxd8 3. Nxf7+ with a three-way fork.

Avatar of 1e4-2Nf3isbest

Knights move

 

Avatar of blueemu

So was his.

I came out a piece up... I had King, Rook and Knight remaining against his King and Rook.

Avatar of 1e4-2Nf3isbest

Literally the simplest rule of chess

 

Avatar of autobunny
TXBaseballFan wrote:

Literally the simplest rule of chess

Easier than a bishop move? 

Avatar of blueemu

Yeah, Bishops doing their creepy diagonal thing might be simpler.

Avatar of blueemu
IronIC_U wrote: ... Oh, shoot.  I can’t resist!...

Yeah, I figured you lost your focus when I said "three way".

Avatar of autobunny
blueemu wrote:

Yeah, Bishops doing their creepy diagonal thing might be simpler.

Rooks and kings might have been simple if not for the castling thing