| Strength | White | Black |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 59 | 58 |
| Good | 6 | 13 |
| Inaccuracy (?!) | 9 | 7 |
| Mistake (?) | 0 | 0 |
| Blunder (??) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg. Diff | 0.53 | 0.40 |
It shows that an important blunder was 47 Kd3 after your opponent blundered with 46..Rc4. You could have won the game by taking his rook, because you would have won his c and a pawns too, before his king could get into the game.
You identified one of the other blunders, 63 Kh7 but it didn't really matter because your opponent counter blundered and gave you another chance to go after his pawn.
Trading off the queens was your fatal mistake. You had no chance after that. If you had just gone back with your king to h6, he would have had a tough time making any progress. I think it would have been a draw because if he moves his own king, he would be open to endless checks from your queen.
I like the computer analysis here but it is hard to copy into a thread like this. I find all the clock info fairly annoying. It doesn't look like the clock was a factor in your game. I wish there was an easy way to just make it disappear.
Hi guys ,
First time adding a game here, played a great game recently, i lost unfortuntely but i am fairly happy considering the length of the game and i only made 1 blunder throughout according to chess.com engine.
Feel free to comment and / or critic.
Again its first time posting a game, i copied straight from skid so hope it works.
Also does anybody know how i can annotate my games using skid, i find skid quite confusing to use, im sure im not the only one
Apologies for not being able to annotate.
My feelings on the game were that i played solid, my only major deliberations were moves:
10. Deciding to sacrifice the bishop on Bd2 or leve it and move Qd3.
62. Move Kh6 and in another variation move 64 place the king on h6