3...Nc6?? blunders the f6 Knight to 4. exf6. Accuracy score (CAPS) is much easier to score "high" with when the opponent (in this case you) blunders really early in the game. It is easier to find good moves when you have a material advantage almost right away, so it is easier to get a higher accuracy score.
Both sides appeared to have played a fair game that is around the expected level for their rating range.
did he cheat tho?
I think your opponent was clean, and accuracy is not used for cheat detection. It is most likely that his accuracy was inflated because of 3. Nc6??.
He probably used engine.
Lame troll attempt - no one is going to play this poorly with an engine. @kingsonicthehedgehog is clearly oblivious (unless attention-seeking) and that is why they created this serious thread.
Cheating discussions are not allowed in the public forums; if you suspect a fair play violation, then simply report it to chess.com and let them investigate it - this game looks fair to me though. The White pieces really didn't play outstandingly well - they just happened to score a high CAPS score because of the Black side blundering a Knight so early in the game.
He probably used engine.
Lame troll attempt - no one is going to play this poorly with an engine. @kingsonicthehedgehog is clearly oblivious (unless attention-seeking) and that is why they created this serious thread.
Cheating discussions are not allowed in the public forums; if you suspect a fair play violation, then simply report it to chess.com and let them investigate it - this game looks fair to me though. The White pieces really didn't play outstandingly well - they just happened to score a high CAPS score because of the Black side blundering a Knight so early in the game.
im not intencging that he cheated, it just seems impossible
It is very possible even for a lower rated player to score 99.4 CAPS score in one game. This statistic sounds a bit misleading because it sounds like they found the "best move" 99.4% of the time and that is so close to 100% so they played almost perfectly...although not untrue, it misinterprets how this CAPS score is generated. This doesn't take into account factors like how hard moves were to find (easy to see 4. exf6) or engine depth (pretty sure this "99.4" came from "quick analysis", but this is more superficial and a deeper analysis may reveal that White actually didn't play as well as 99.4).
Here is a good video on a bit on how CAPS works:
Google traduction :
when a player gives gifts and the other player takes the gifts he plays the best possible moves, especially if the game is short, he can have a high percentage of accuracy.
You made a number of mistakes your opponent just had to profit from your mistakes.
I admit that Bxh7 + is rather strong as a blow ..... I don't know if you could save the game with Kh8 or Kg6.
He probably used engine.
Lame troll attempt - no one is going to play this poorly with an engine. @kingsonicthehedgehog is clearly oblivious (unless attention-seeking) and that is why they created this serious thread.
Cheating discussions are not allowed in the public forums; if you suspect a fair play violation, then simply report it to chess.com and let them investigate it - this game looks fair to me though. The White pieces really didn't play outstandingly well - they just happened to score a high CAPS score because of the Black side blundering a Knight so early in the game.
im not intencging that he cheated, it just seems impossible
99.4 is very much possible. Early blundering or long simple endgames could boost up the CAPS score by a lot.
He cheated, like almost everyone else I come across on this site. Chess.com does not do enough to dump the cheaters. It's a pandemic. Much much worse on this site than on others. It makes me so annoyed the fakes are getting away with it.
When in doubt, always report. That is the only sure way to know.
This. And also the very annoying thing that follows sometimes is when people say publicly that they reported someone they thought was cheating a while ago and they haven't been banned yet. If they haven't banned them yet, maybe they were not cheating? Maybe they haven't gotten to the report yet because so many people are obnoxious in thinking anyone who beats them cheats and send way more reports than needed?
Also, in before the lock, this is a cheating thread.
Google traduction :
I played 3000 games. I never denounced anyone. only once I had a big doubt because I was beaten by an 800 while I was in the 1300. I analyzed it had made more than 90% of precision but me only in the 70%. I had nevertheless played well without blunder. I lost 15 or 16 points at the time. No big deal, I got them back later.
If there are really a lot of players doing this then I'm worth more than 1350 youppie !
You blundered early and gave white a very easy game. Lots of people could score 99% against you if you play like that.
That's no disrespect intended, i've played my share of stinkers, It happens. But that's not an indication that someone is cheating, and this is not the place to report it.
If you believe you've been cheated, there is a process for reporting it. Smearing someone's good name in the forums is unethical.
Accuracy is so high because it's easy to get high accuracy when opponent plays like garbage (like in this case).
i lost
but he got 99.4 accuracy
you lost alot of pieces here and got greek gifted thats why he got such a high acciracy
When the game mainly consists of black hanging his pieces and white simply capturing them, you could expect a high accuracy score. Who needs a computer to play 4.exf5 and 8.cxb4? Even your 15...Kh8 was the worst possible move on the board.
In one way, I have to admire your courage. If I had played Black in that game, I would never have shown it to anyone--ever!
i lost
but he got 99.4 accuracy
[Thread Locked by blitzblunderz - Public Callouts & Cheating Accusations are unallowed, if you would like to have discussions about cheating in chess, check out the Cheating Forum!]