You're too young to cheat. Definitely not.
Am I cheating?
Sort:
icyviper wrote:
this seems to be missing some final moves...
for example 37. Kd3 Kg8 38. a3 Kf7 39. b4 and now 39...cxb 40. axb a4 doesnt work because after 41. Kxd4 the king is within range of catching the pawn.
4...h6 is not a good move because it gives white time to castle/fully develop and begin dangerous plans. Black, meanwhile, needs 3(!) moves to castle. 5...Nf6 should of course be met with 6. e5 . Something simple is enough: 6. e5 Ne4 7. Re1 Nc5 8. Nxd4
Using the chess.com computers, I already know what you just said.
Jul 22, 2016
0
#4
Did you use an engine during the game? Did you receive any outside help during the game? If the answer to both questions is no, you didn't cheat.
Jul 22, 2016
0
#5
I feel the need to point out that people on the Internet can be sore losers. They would rather accuse you of cheating than accept their loss and move on.
I do not think that my opponent was a sore loser, just a misguided accuser.
wanmokewan wrote:
Did you use an engine during the game? Did you receive any outside help during the game? If the answer to both questions is no, you didn't cheat.
I definitely know I didn't cheat, but I have to prove it, so I created this forum so the chess.com members can have a say.
here's the game, by the way:
https://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=134092858
Jul 22, 2016
0
#8
You don't have to prove anything. Anyone who makes an accusation of cheating just because they lost is a sore loser in my opinion.
If an inoccent man goes to trial for.. let's say burglary, and he know's he is inoccent, he still needs to prove himself, in court, because there is a person who thinks that man robbed his house, so that man has to show proof to the person, so she know he didn't rob their house.
that is correct, just because someone SAYS they think you are using an engine matters very little. cc has said that if your not engine cheating you shouldn't worry about it. the Point is that chess engines play very different than even strong players. you can see this , if you take your typical game and look for the engines top recommendations on every moves. many times they look odd. they are not designed to "make sense" to you, they are picked by an algorithm that ensures they don't lose the game.
futher information cannot be given outside of the proper group.
in a phrase-- don't worry about it.
If my opponent reports me, the admins can look at this forum and see I'm not cheating.
Jul 22, 2016
0
#12
I stink at chess so bad I wish someone would accuse me of cheating! 
Jul 22, 2016
0
#13
The staff have their own methods of detecting cheating. They can see your game archive; there's no need to make a topic like this.
What's the chess.com policy of a married man cheating his wife for another woman ? Can the player be banned if video evidence etc is provided ?
Jul 22, 2016
0
#15
Ziggy_Zugzwang wrote:
What's the chess.com policy of a married man cheating his wife for another woman ? Can the player be bannned if video evidence etc is provided ?
See #3.
And staff rules prohibit that, though that's not listed as cheating.
Boyangzhao wrote:
If an inoccent man goes to trial for.. let's say burglary, and he know's he is inoccent, he still needs to prove himself, in court, because there is a person who thinks that man robbed his house, so that man has to show proof to the person, so she know he didn't rob their house.
No, he doesn't. Innocent until proven guilty.
The prosecutor has to prove that you DID rob the house. And if he does it's your job to proof he's wrong.
if you have to worry about people accusing you on chess-sites, it's like a day job.
Besides, someone who resigns in a (probably) drawn position needs not to be taken serious.
I can't tell if you were with another women...
nevermind the story.
After playing a corrospondence game, my opponent accused me of using a engine or a book:
Can anyone tell me if they think I was cheating in this game or not?