ajl721x a écrit :
What the heck was this game??
A game I analysed ^^
AMAZING! 99.6 Precision for Whites and still get checkmated in 18 moves!
Sort:
Feb 26, 2021
0
#3
The current precision score for whites dropped from 99.6 at the time I analysed to a lower score with a new analysis.
that's crazy
It is interesting, but many times I will take my games and study them with a board, and find that the analysis engine is not really deep.
It's not surprising at all. In chess, unlike most games, you came play great, totally outplaying your opponent, right up to the point where you snooze for an instant and get mated!
Very interesting. This shows how just making 1 bad move doesn't completely change your accuracy, which is expected.
Feb 26, 2021
0
#8
NobleElevator a écrit :
Very interesting. This shows how just making 1 bad move doesn't completely change your accuracy, which is expected.
To me it's basically amazing that it's completly losing after 7.Nxe5?? for whites.
Just d6 + Bg4 + Nf3+ + Bxf3 and Ng4-Qh4 in every line wins for blacks.
Yes it does change it. One bad move in 18 is 94.44% accuracy. It isn't possible that it's 99.6%.
Feb 26, 2021
0
#10
Optimissed a écrit :
Yes it does change it. One bad move in 18 is 94.44% accuracy. It isn't possible that it's 99.6%.
The computer doesn't see mistake from whites' move which is 7.Nxe5 ?. When I firstly analysed the game it said me 99.6 for whites
Right, I see. It is difficult to spot but looking at it, I thought it was something to do with the f2 pawn being pinned. I thought maybe white could have tried to retreat to d3, rather than playing b4. Is that any good or not? I mean, why did white even take on e5? It had to be bad because it doesn't help white at all.
Feb 26, 2021
0
#12
Optimissed a écrit :
Right, I see. It is difficult to spot but looking at it, I thought it was something to do with the f2 pawn being pinned. I thought maybe white could have tried to retreat to d3, rather than playing b4. Is that any good or not? I mean, why did white even take on e5? It had to be bad because it doesn't help white at all.
Same stuff in every line : d6 + Bg4 + Nf3 and after gxf3; Bxf3 just Ng4+Qh4
Yes, I saw the basic theme and it looked horrible for white. I don't know the opening .... can't even remember its name but I know that Nf6 isn't great for black. I suppose white either castles or plays d3. Even Qe2 would probably work but Nc3 just looks awful. Like a badly played Vienna Game.
Feb 26, 2021
0
#14
Optimissed a écrit :
Yes, I saw the basic theme and it looked horrible for white. I don't know the opening .... can't even remember its name but I know that Nf6 isn't great for black. I suppose white either castles or plays d3. Even Qe2 would probably work but Nc3 just looks awful. Like a badly played Vienna Game.
Nf6 bad ? Ahah no no, it's a legendary opening named Berlin defense of the Ruy-Lopez and it's just perfectly fine for blacks. Actually 6.O-O is not a main move of this opening, surely inaccurate and 7.Nxe5 bad.
Doesn't it have a reputation for being dull and unenterprising? I haven't played 1. e4 in serious games for nearly three decades and you can probably tell. Not knowing the opening and what the pawns do if Q e2 in some lines, I would play d3. And then, I suppose, c3.
Feb 26, 2021
0
#16
Optimissed a écrit :
Doesn't it have a reputation for being dull and unenterprising? I haven't played 1. e4 in serious games for nearly three decades and you can probably tell. Not knowing the opening and what the pawns do if Q e2 in some lines, I would play d3. And then, I suppose, c3.
Just after 3.Bb5; Nf6 if 4.Qe2 with the planning c3+d4 later the counter is 4. ...Bc5!
The main move against 3.Nf6 are 4.O-O, 4.Bxc6 and 4.d3
#6 yeah
kJDG12 wrote:
Optimissed a écrit :
Doesn't it have a reputation for being dull and unenterprising? I haven't played 1. e4 in serious games for nearly three decades and you can probably tell. Not knowing the opening and what the pawns do if Q e2 in some lines, I would play d3. And then, I suppose, c3.
Just after 3.Bb5; Nf6 if 4.Qe2 with the planning c3+d4 later the counter is 4. ...Bc5!
The main move against 3.Nf6 are 4.O-O, 4.Bxc6 and 4.d3
Fischer would perhaps have played Qe2 with c3 and d3, with the intention of h3, g4 and a K-side attack. If in doubt, play like Fischer. Not, for instance, like Botwinnik.
Feb 28, 2021
0
#20
Optimissed a écrit :
kJDG12 wrote:
Optimissed a écrit :
Doesn't it have a reputation for being dull and unenterprising? I haven't played 1. e4 in serious games for nearly three decades and you can probably tell. Not knowing the opening and what the pawns do if Q e2 in some lines, I would play d3. And then, I suppose, c3.
Just after 3.Bb5; Nf6 if 4.Qe2 with the planning c3+d4 later the counter is 4. ...Bc5!
The main move against 3.Nf6 are 4.O-O, 4.Bxc6 and 4.d3
Fischer would perhaps have played Qe2 with c3 and d3, with the intention of h3, g4 and a K-side attack. If in doubt, play like Fischer. Not, for instance, like Botwinnik.
Actually Fischer played 3 time the most classical continuation at that time : 4.O-O , in 1963 against Bisguier (1-0), Fuller (1-0) and Neikirkh (draw) .
Here is a link of the analysis : https://www.chess.com/a/2UFSTLxXQ28J2a