Analysis thread: Part 1

des that count my vote for nc5?

maybe bf4 is better though

Just changed it

ask for th opinion of the coach in chess.com

hai jack

nice game and difficult position

I am low on the totem pole for an average, but I will play. First I would like to say what a pleasure seeing only two pawns missing with all of those moves, rare for me. Okay to business. I am undecided about castling, but presently leaning right, but would prefer to wait a move or so to help determine which way.  Ne7 can easily be brought under attack by two pieces with a bishop move by white, and I only have one minor piece defending (along with the king). So my move is Nb6. This opens up the seventh rank and now my Queen is also protecting Ne7, and Nb6 can potentially be brought to c4 threatening Q, B, And b2.  Now going to go read everyone else's replies.

I would castle kingside, but castling queenside is probably just as good.

I would play h4, to force a decision on the kingside, and only then decide, probably queenside, except maybe not because of the hook on c6

locker

draw

very strong two player

Bayi, what are you taking about.

yes about the game analysis

Block him that;s it

Blocked. I've seen him in other threads spamming stuff that's completely irrelevant.

This is a game I played with high accuracy, do you suggest any other moves than the ones I played? Can you please message those moves directly to me if so. 

You’d think a 1700 would have more class.