Found a game analysis in which the suggested "best move sequence" of the engine makes no sense. Loaded the position seperately into the engine, and it gives very different best moves. Not a complex position either. Did you notice the engine giving bad move sequences as "best moves" before, or am I missing something?
Game: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/82078861420?tab=review&move=31
Situation: On move 16, Qd6 - in the game analysis, it suggests knight to b6, which looks wrong, as the best move. Then in the follow up sequence it sacrifices the white queen, which seems totally unnecessary.
The strength the review is ran at will have an impact. I'm showing Qxd5 as the best reply to 16. ... Qd6
Found a game analysis in which the suggested "best move sequence" of the engine makes no sense. Loaded the position seperately into the engine, and it gives very different best moves. Not a complex position either. Did you notice the engine giving bad move sequences as "best moves" before, or am I missing something?
Game: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/82078861420?tab=review&move=31
Situation: On move 16, Qd6 - in the game analysis, it suggests knight to b6, which looks wrong, as the best move. Then in the follow up sequence it sacrifices the white queen, which seems totally unnecessary.