Blown endgame?? Analysis please!
Ok I am going to try to post what I believe as blunders.
First: Pretty good with developing.
Second: At sixteen, the Qxd5 was a "Not-so-good" exchange in my eyes. It really made you lose some very good ground you were gaining to that point in my eyes. With that move, and the upcoming moves, that was a big blunder.
Third: 18: Bxe5 was a terrible exchange. A knight is less powerful than a bishop in this game. (Reminder: THIS IS IN MY EYES!)
Fourth: 49: Rxd7+ was not a very good move because it caused you to lose something that you have little of: Power. The way it is developing is very "Draw-ish".
Fifth: I agree with the 58 gxh5 annotation. Terrible move to sacrifice that pawn. Taking the pawn probably would've created a win for you.
Sixth: You lost. haha
But these are all in my thoughts.
Ok I am going to try to post what I believe as blunders.
First: Pretty good with developing.
Second: At sixteen, the Qxd5 was a "Not-so-good" exchange in my eyes. It really made you lose some very good ground you were gaining to that point in my eyes. With that move, and the upcoming moves, that was a big blunder.
Third: 18: Bxe5 was a terrible exchange. A knight is less powerful than a bishop in this game. (Reminder: THIS IS IN MY EYES!)
Fourth: 49: Rxd7+ was not a very good move because it caused you to lose something that you have little of: Power. The way it is developing is very "Draw-ish".
Fifth: I agree with the 58 gxh5 annotation. Terrible move to sacrifice that pawn. Taking the pawn probably would've created a win for you.
Sixth: You lost. haha
But these are all in my thoughts.
Ok I am going to try to post what I believe as blunders.
First: Pretty good with developing.
Second: At sixteen, the Qxd5 was a "Not-so-good" exchange in my eyes. It really made you lose some very good ground you were gaining to that point in my eyes. With that move, and the upcoming moves, that was a big blunder.
Third: 18: Bxe5 was a terrible exchange. A knight is less powerful than a bishop in this game. (Reminder: THIS IS IN MY EYES!)
Fourth: 49: Rxd7+ was not a very good move because it caused you to lose something that you have little of: Power. The way it is developing is very "Draw-ish".
Fifth: I agree with the 58 gxh5 annotation. Terrible move to sacrifice that pawn. Taking the pawn probably would've created a win for you.
Sixth: You lost. haha
But these are all in my thoughts.
I posted this 3 times to get this visible
For the pawn and rook endgame, it's great that you had your rook placed on the seventh rank, which restricts your opponent's king. Try to eventually get your king in front of your pawns and keep the pawns connected as you march them up. Other than that, watch out for stalemates.
Keep in mind that the king pawn endgame resulting from a rook trade is easily winning for you, so your oppenent would not be able to give you checks with his rook effectively if you can simply intercept the attack with your own rook.
49 Rxd7+ was fine. You're coming out with R + 2 connected pawns vs R + 1, which should be a win.
I would suggest 75 Ka5 followed by 76 b5. I think the best way to figure out what to do here is to consult the Nalimov endgame tablebase (since there are only 6 pieces involved here). That link is...
http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en
Using this, you can punch the position in and find instantly the results of all the variations in any given situation. Fiddle around with it and no doubt you'll learn a lot about these types of endgames (and of course any others you might want to explore).
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.