Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report


(https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/37088523?tab=review)
It is a brilliant move.Go check it!

Can I show you some thing,I did a brilliant move huh,link = (https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/37088523?tab=review)

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/75625161325?tab=review
MY FİRST BRİLİANTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
İ`m 400 btw
and my score in game is 54.7

if only chess.com would explain brilliant moves. great moves do barely anything for me, they're always so obvious. like, yeah, the opponent blundered a queen and i took it. wowww. so smart.

The Chess.com analysis is a joke!
Depends on the eyes you are looking from and where you are looking - concerining the 'brilliant' stuff. Most of mine are perfectly okay. But I look at a 1200 (for example) and find them....'amusing'. The analysis in generally is good enough though. I wish it were better, but you have to start somewhere.

if only chess.com would explain brilliant moves. great moves do barely anything for me, they're always so obvious. like, yeah, the opponent blundered a queen and i took it. wowww. so smart.
Here's a definition for you: https://support.chess.com/article/2965-how-are-moves-classified-what-is-a-blunder-or-brilliant-and-etc#:~:text=We%20replaced%20the%20old%20Brilliant,had%20not%20found%20the%20move
"We replaced the old Brilliant algorithm with a simpler definition: a Brilliant move is when you find a good piece sacrifice. There are some other conditions, like you should not be in a bad position after a Brilliant move and you should not be completely winning even if you had not found the move. Also, we are more generous in defining a piece sacrifice for newer players, compared with those who are higher rated."

ok no i dont understand why this was chaotic
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/75935502177?tab=review
Bad defense for black...bad moves for both sides. Just a bad chaotic game. Next question?

The game favour tilted not that mutch. If it pendeled at least 3 times then you could call that chaotic
I call 'chaotic' a bunch of bad moves for both sides...anything could happen...don't have to have a graph showing lots of ups and downs.

I think ones mom would consider such a room - full of books lying on the ground...chaotic.
I'm not a mom...but see books on the ground in this room which my wife says "looks like a cyclone hit it"
Analogies only hint at things. Staying with chess (oh, and those ARE chess books I refer too...) a bunch of bad moves make for a chaotic game...maybe the opponents are not good enough to find good replies and there are not many 'ups and downs' on a graph...but it's still a chaotic game.

ok I just want to say, to get a brilliant move you have to play a move that is not necessarly the best, but that either sacrifices a piece/pawn or that is very hard to find like a random king move in an engame (there are more). You also have to be either going to lose or draw or the second best move if you're winning has a like maximum +2 advantage (-2 for black ig).