Can someone please guide why c5 for black was a bad move here?

Sort:
manoj05

Hello friends,

I played with a player ranked about 450 points to be and was out played. I managed to give a fight but was trailing all along.

The player used the English opening and on third move I (black) played c5. Aim was to control centre dissuade white from playing d4.

So I thought it was a good move but on doing analysis with computer it calls it an inaccuracy. Can anyone share why it is an inaccuracy ie why is it a bad move?

c5

Thanks!

PS : here is link to the game

notmtwain
manoj05 wrote:

Hello friends,

I played with a player ranked about 450 points to be and was out played. I managed to give a fight but was trailing all along.

The player used the English opening and on third move I (black) played c5. Aim was to control centre dissuade white from playing d4.

So I thought it was a good move but on doing analysis with computer it calls it an inaccuracy. Can anyone share why it is an inaccuracy ie why is it a bad move?

 

Thanks!

PS : here is link to the game

Pay no attention to opening analysis from such things. 

Letsplaychess_96

The point of c5 is to answer d4 with cd. My first impression is that that would help white though, because it opens up the dark squared bishop.

FangBo

By playing b6 and Bb7 you give white the centre. 

This early on development is key, you need to get your kingside pieces into play.

C5 is not a developing move.

omnipaul

To further explain notmtwain's comment, computer analysis just isn't as good in the opening phase.  There's often too much to calculate with very little difference between many positions.  This is why computers still use an opening book when you play against them.

 

For the opening phase, it is much better to look at an opening database, such as the Explorer on this site.  There are 21 games after 3.e3.  3. ... c5 has the 2nd most number of games, only 1 game less than 3. ... e6.  The top move has a higher win percentage for black, but the move you played has a much larger draw percentage as well as a significantly lower loss percentage for black.

 

Given that, yeah, you can say c5 was an "inaccuracy" since it is far more drawish than e6.  But again, this is the opening phase and we're not experts, so the difference between them doesn't really mean as much.

Sred

c5 is perfectly fine.

Ellen_Hall

Don't always listen to computers.

HatsuzukiMeiso

There's nothing bad in it. I do feel that it has nothing to do. Engines are too much for humans to handle. Better not pay attention to it.

HatsuzukiMeiso

I think ....c5 is not the best, but ok to play. slight difference was ....e6. Idea is that Black is nott showing what he'll do in the center.

HatsuzukiMeiso

Ellen_Hall is right:

"Don't always listen to computers."

Nicator65
manoj05 wrote:

Hello friends,

I played with a player ranked about 450 points to be and was out played. I managed to give a fight but was trailing all along.

The player used the English opening and on third move I (black) played c5. Aim was to control centre dissuade white from playing d4.

So I thought it was a good move but on doing analysis with computer it calls it an inaccuracy. Can anyone share why it is an inaccuracy ie why is it a bad move?

 

Thanks!

PS : here is link to the game

Well, it is a bad move. White can play d2-d4-d5 and support the d5-pawn with e3-e4, getting a nice space advantage for free. On the loss of tempo in e2-e3-e4, it's more than compensated because in the resulting pawn structure ...b7-b6 and ...Bc8-b7 are a waste of tempos for Black.

You may have seen games where Black plays ...c7-c5, but you failed to notice that Black previously played to control e4 (thus not allowing e3-e4 or making it risky) and was ready for ...d7-d5 (thus not giving White the time for d4-d5).

About the engine's "opinion" at that early stage of the game, it's often wrong when just a few seconds to analyze and no openings book. On people's opinions that unless there's a line proving that Black loses it is playable... well... should they be right then positional play is wrong.

HatsuzukiMeiso
Nicator65 wrote:
manoj05 wrote:

Hello friends,

I played with a player ranked about 450 points to be and was out played. I managed to give a fight but was trailing all along.

The player used the English opening and on third move I (black) played c5. Aim was to control centre dissuade white from playing d4.

So I thought it was a good move but on doing analysis with computer it calls it an inaccuracy. Can anyone share why it is an inaccuracy ie why is it a bad move?

 

Thanks!

PS : here is link to the game

Well, it is a bad move. White can play d2-d4-d5 and support the d5-pawn with e3-e4, getting a nice space advantage for free. On the loss of tempo in e2-e3-e4, it's more than compensated because in the resulting pawn structure ...b7-b6 and ...Bc8-b7 are a waste of tempos for Black.

You may have seen games where Black plays ...c7-c5, but you failed to notice that Black previously played to control e4 (thus not allowing e3-e4 or making it risky) and was ready for ...d7-d5 (thus not giving White the time for d4-d5).

About the engine's "opinion" at that early stage of the game, it's often wrong when just a few seconds to analyze and no openings book. On people's opinions that unless there's a line proving that Black loses it is playable... well... should they be right then positional play is wrong.

 

MatthewFreitag

The chess.com analysis board is inconsistent at best.

For openings most moves should be alright. Is it a great move? Probably not, but there is no obvious error to it.

manoj05
ChessRook5T1 wrote:

c5 can be good or bad in some cases for 1 it controls a nice square (d4) and sometimes b4 a it prepares a possible isolated queen pawn position of sorts sometimes if c5 d4 cxd4 exd4 sometimes you play d5 to stop the pawns in their tracks leading to a isolated queen pawn position which can be good in these cases for both sides..

its a weakness its all out there alone and sad it has no other pawn to support it and it has to be defended by pieces so a good plan is to trade pieces ( most likely knights/bishops) the minor pieces are most likely the defender of the isolated d pawn is minor pieces trades are best for you also because some dynamic pluses for having the isolated d pawn is piece activity so try to trade those stupid knights and bishops off to make ye pawn a weakness instead of a strength 

I did not get how c5 can lead to an isolated pawn. Some queries wrt this:

1) Isolated pawn for me (black) or the opponent?

2) After c5 d4 cxd4 exd4 (ie 3. .. c5 4. d4 cxd4 5. exd4) where is there an isolated pawn? is white's d4 isolated? But doesn't it have pawn on c4 for company?

manoj05
ChessRook5T1 wrote:

sorry about all these notes btw a have a hard time writing one giant note

also the bishop is quite fine on g7 when g6 and bg7 are in tow and let’s face it... The bishop probably has no future on any other square (except e7 the bishop would do good on e7 ) if your need anymore help I’ll try my best to help you

One query - on doing computer analysis the computer shows numbers for each move eg +0.24 etc.. Do you pay attention to those while checking the game or just ignore them?

 

And about any more help - yes, if you can check the entire game and share main improvement point for me then that would be super helpful (I am being greedy!) happy.png

manoj05
ChessRook5T1 wrote:

And hey I got second!! Beat that everyone who isn’t notmtwain lol

happy.pngthumbup.png

manoj05
letsplaychess1996 wrote:

The point of c5 is to answer d4 with cd. My first impression is that that would help white though, because it opens up the dark squared bishop.

I did not get it - dark squared bishop of black or white? And how - can you pl share more details.

manoj05
omnipaul wrote:

To further explain notmtwain's comment, computer analysis just isn't as good in the opening phase.  There's often too much to calculate with very little difference between many positions.  This is why computers still use an opening book when you play against them.

 

For the opening phase, it is much better to look at an opening database, such as the Explorer on this site.  There are 21 games after 3.e3.  3. ... c5 has the 2nd most number of games, only 1 game less than 3. ... e6.  The top move has a higher win percentage for black, but the move you played has a much larger draw percentage as well as a significantly lower loss percentage for black.

 

Given that, yeah, you can say c5 was an "inaccuracy" since it is far more drawish than e6.  But again, this is the opening phase and we're not experts, so the difference between them doesn't really mean as much.

Very good and educative points. And you took lot of efforts by checking old games. Thanks!

llamonade2

It's not a great move, but neither is it so bad that white has something to be excited about. I'd call it one of those 2nd rate, but up to personal taste, moves.

manoj05
anat743 wrote:
manoj05 wrote:

Hello friends,

I played with a player ranked about 450 points to be and was out played. I managed to give a fight but was trailing all along.

The player used the English opening and on third move I (black) played c5. Aim was to control centre dissuade white from playing d4.

So I thought it was a good move but on doing analysis with computer it calls it an inaccuracy. Can anyone share why it is an inaccuracy ie why is it a bad move?

 

Thanks!

PS : here is link to the game

Ignore it- but  6...f5 was far worse- c5 was playable

True -  with f5 i gave an opening to white's knight to come to g6 square.