Chess is a draw

Sort:
Ruhubelent

Theoretical value of the game is a draw, without a doubt. Let us try it with 7 men endgame tablebase. TO this tablebase, we will give symmetrical positions with pieces that are enough to give mate behind paws.

This is a draw according to the tablebase.
No matter how you do it, as long as pieces are symmetrical and blocked by a pawn, the game is a draw. 
 
so, with 32 pieces, it will still be a draw. First move advantage does not give anything to white, if it gave, then why Queen+king+pawn against Queen+king+pawn is not a forced mate for white? I even gave move odds to white, white is to move in this following position:
Not only first-move advantage is not enough for mate, two moves also are not enough.
AS long as defending pieces of black is equal to attacking pieces, it is a draw in a symmetrical position.
 
With 7 pieces alongwith King, it will still be the same as they are blocked by pawns.
Ruhubelent

White with 3 move odds, it is mate in 15

It is mate in 15. 

 

 

 
tn85N

Just a very simplified view about the question.

 

I think it is (occasionally) true that until the position for white and black is symmetrical (meaning: same number of pieces, with a mirror plane crossing e.g. the line along a4a5-h4h5) on the board, the evaluation of it is draw.

More accurately, it is draw, if the symmetry cannot be broken (typically in some endgame) or / and when it can be still restored afterwards.

 

However, at some point at the opening the symmetry will be necessarily broken, and then the game become complex.

 

what breaks the symmetry:

- At occurence of check, the immediate answer is almost always any but non symmetric (and it could not be asked from the opponent not to give chess).

- The capturing piece in the case of a symmetrical position on the board is the same kind but of different color (there is absolutely no meaning agreeing in not to capture at all the same kind of piece).

- Non mirrorable moves due of impossibility to jump through the piece moved just right now.

- Just after any piece is captured, the opposite side can avoid from the same event to happen (which is usually the preferred choice).

- The opponent can capture a piece by making a move which not maintaining symmetry any more.

- In the case of attack on any pieces, symmetry also will be preferably(usually) broken.

 

So the question is, in the opening, when the first occurence of breaking the symmetry occurs? Is it happening for black or white ?...

 

Based on the above ones, there is no reason of effort on keeping the symmetry at the opening for too long by effort, as this only leads to draw, at best cases.

The pawn structure is the only one which cannot be restored to the original position. The other pieces could be, at least theoretically.

 

So, finally: looking at / for games starting with symmetrical positions, could give some idea about how and when the symmetry breaking happens during the first moves, and what are the roles of the pawns in that.