On move 17, I had the short thought of a5, however, I discarded it because I didn't realize that even if axb5, I could sac my knight by opening the queen side and pressuring the king. And if bxa5, I didn't realize that it opens up my bishop and will lead to an attack on the queen side that cannot be stopped.
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
A game that turned into a closed position with opposite colored bishops started off as a normal London, but eventually I played 13. Bxf6 thinking that the queen cannot take due to xb5, but the pawn takes back and then we get into a position with opposite colored bishops. After black pushes some pawns on move 17. I decided to castle before playing a5, which was a mistake as it allows black to play a5 himself, although this move was never played in the game, instead playing 17... g3 18. xg3 19. Bxg3 (the mistake.) After this I expected black to be able to bring the queen to g5 and win my backward E pawn, so I played 19. Nf3, also a mistake as it allows the aforementioned a5 to be played by black. However, black missed this move again and instead played f6 trying to restrict my knights development.
Then after trading down black plays 25... e4 attacking the knight, missing Bxc4 (which I did not play as it seems as it is quite an dubious move to play, trading a bishop for 3 pawns). Instead of Bxc4, I played 26. Nd4, black took, and I took with the rook. after 28. Be3? (a mistake) I can get my rook back on the first rank and connected with the other rook, and after 29... Rf8?? I am able to win blacks bishop with 30. Bh5+!. after this we traded pieces down to a winning endgame for me and I won the game 1-0.
If I missed anything feel free to comment it, and have a great day!