Does this level of play deserve a "37.5% accuracy score?"
Sort:
@ethanylyung “so stockfish relies on SINGLE moves not deeply thought plans and bases so sometimes stockfish goes TOTALLY haywire.” Aha, that might be another factor that results in haywire scores, thanks.
To others who have commented: It’s interesting how our own insecurities and challenges can sometimes shape our perspectives and reactions. Chess, after all, is a mirror to our own minds, revealing much about our strengths and areas for growth. It takes a certain vulnerability to put yourselves out there, and I commend everyone for sharing their thoughts so openly.
Jul 22, 2024
0
#23
No, it doesn't deserve that high accuracy. It must be maximum 25 %, not that high
GaucheInTheMachine wrote:
@ethanylyung “so stockfish relies on SINGLE moves not deeply thought plans and bases so sometimes stockfish goes TOTALLY haywire.” Aha, that might be another factor that results in haywire scores, thanks.
Don't thank the guy, because what he wrote about "single moves" in mostly nonsense. Stockfish analyzes so deep that it can discover even deep plans.
Moreover, what he wrote about Stockfish not noticing mate-in-6 because it "hates the position" is even more obvious nonsense.