Free Game Analysis! - Chess Forums - Page 15

reggiegardner

Jul 27, 2020

0

#281

According to chess.com what’s the best chess book to consider based on my skill set? To whom it may concern, my name is Reggie and I am an avid chess player that enjoys the game of chess. I’m not happy with my numbers and I personally feel I can be more adept at chess when I’d connect all the dots. Because there's a lot more room for improvement. Having said all that; here are my numbers according to Chess.com: 889 Rating - 616 Games - L, 300gms - 49% - W, 306gms - 50% - Draw, 1% - Average Opponent Rating: 880. Winning Streak, 8 - Losing Streak, 8. Can anyone please help me with this matter?! Thanks a lot in advance everyone! -ReggieBlackwater

Homsar

Jul 27, 2020

0

#282

ReggieBlackwater wrote:

According to chess.com what’s the best chess book to consider based on my skill set? To whom it may concern, my name is Reggie and I am an avid chess player that enjoys the game of chess. I’m not happy with my numbers and I personally feel I can be more adept at chess when I’d connect all the dots. Because there's a lot more room for improvement. Having said all that; here are my numbers according to Chess.com: 889 Rating - 616 Games - L, 300gms - 49% - W, 306gms - 50% - Draw, 1% - Average Opponent Rating: 880. Winning Streak, 8 - Losing Streak, 8. Can anyone please help me with this matter?! Thanks a lot in advance everyone! -ReggieBlackwater

Hey hey! You just gave me an idea, I’ll try reviewing the numerous chess books I’ve read for my channel to help others find which would be good for them.

eeeasdfasdf

Jul 27, 2020

0

#283

Props for the initiative. Not all people willingly volunteer to help others.

Homsar

Jul 28, 2020

0

#284

ReggieBlackwater wrote:

According to chess.com what’s the best chess book to consider based on my skill set? To whom it may concern, my name is Reggie and I am an avid chess player that enjoys the game of chess. I’m not happy with my numbers and I personally feel I can be more adept at chess when I’d connect all the dots. Because there's a lot more room for improvement. Having said all that; here are my numbers according to Chess.com: 889 Rating - 616 Games - L, 300gms - 49% - W, 306gms - 50% - Draw, 1% - Average Opponent Rating: 880. Winning Streak, 8 - Losing Streak, 8. Can anyone please help me with this matter?! Thanks a lot in advance everyone! -ReggieBlackwater

Hey there, based off your message I got the idea for a new series of videos. Check out the first video. I'll be doing chess book reviews to give others an idea of what the book is like and weather or not the book would be good for them. I started with Silman's Complete Endgame Course since I love endgames and I feel they should be studied first.

https://youtu.be/Z03I4iVuJWQ

Sourya_Jaladi

Jul 28, 2020

0

#285

wrong one this is the correct one https://www.chess.com/live/game/5209324908

chamo2074

Jul 28, 2020

0

#286

Hey man, thanks for all the analysis you're making. Can you please analyze this game (all of it) AND tell me why is the move 40. c6 not the best move?

Homsar

Jul 28, 2020

0

#287

Botellhus wrote:

Props for the initiative. Not all people willingly volunteer to help others.

Thanks! Check out my channel if you get the chance

Exclam Chess

Gamificast

Jul 29, 2020

0

#288

Thank you for analysing one of my games Homsar. I have another game for you to have a look at and share your thoughts on, if that's OK with you. It's a game where I played an anti-Sicilian opening system that I had recently learned. I thought I played well, but I'd like to hear your opinion.

Homsar

Jul 29, 2020

0

#289

Hey everyone here is the most recent upload, I'm trying to have a new video up everyday.

https://youtu.be/K6hWsNMiIWc

Homsar

Jul 29, 2020

0

#290

I would like to get everyone's input, if you have any suggestions for my channel let me know. Are the videos a good length? I was thinking 10 minutes is a good average but I would like to hear what you think. Should there be more focus on a certain part of the game? Opening? Middlegame? Endgame? I mostly have been doing game analysis but if you have any other idea let me know.

RIP_Your_Rating

Jul 30, 2020

0

#291

pfren wrote:

The double question mark attached to Bxb3 is unfair, as Black is losing anyway.

You should have attached it to the irrational 47...Kc6.

If the bishop stayed on the diagonal, however, it would a) be a much longer win, and b) he can try to move c2/b1-f5 and draw the game, so I feel like 47... Kc6 was not the losing mistake, but 48... Bxb3?? IS.

Homsar

Jul 30, 2020

0

#292

Here is the most recent upload

https://youtu.be/5V3LWJD8jaU

Homsar

Jul 30, 2020

0

#293

CrowdedMonster wrote:

Thanks for looking at it.

No problem!

IM pfren

Jul 30, 2020

0

#294

Gamificast έγραψε:

Thank you for analysing one of my games Homsar. I have another game for you to have a look at and share your thoughts on, if that's OK with you. It's a game where I played an anti-Sicilian opening system that I had recently learned. I thought I played well, but I'd like to hear your opinion.

In those setups, you should NEVER place your bishop at e3/e6 when the opponent can safely reply ...Nd4/Nd5, as then the only way to get rid of it is taking with the bishop.

Your opponent did not play 9...Nd4, but this does not mean your 9.Be3 was a good move.

The "opposite" is also valid: you should not go for ...Nd4/Nd5 if your opponent can safely chop there with a knight.

Homsar

Jul 30, 2020

0

#295

pfren wrote:

Gamificast έγραψε:

Thank you for analysing one of my games Homsar. I have another game for you to have a look at and share your thoughts on, if that's OK with you. It's a game where I played an anti-Sicilian opening system that I had recently learned. I thought I played well, but I'd like to hear your opinion.

In those setups, you should NEVER place your bishop at e3/e6 when the opponent can safely reply ...Nd4/Nd5, as then the only way to get rid of it is taking with the bishop.

Your opponent did not play 9...Nd4, but this does not mean your 9.Be3 was a good move.

The "opposite" is also valid: you should not go for ...Nd4/Nd5 if your opponent can safely chop there with a knight.

The IM has returned to share his wisdom with us.

Gamificast

Jul 30, 2020

0

#296

pfren wrote:

In those setups, you should NEVER place your bishop at e3/e6 when the opponent can safely reply ...Nd4/Nd5, as then the only way to get rid of it is taking with the bishop.

Your opponent did not play 9...Nd4, but this does not mean your 9.Be3 was a good move.

The "opposite" is also valid: you should not go for ...Nd4/Nd5 if your opponent can safely chop there with a knight.

Great advice. Thank you very much!

NM EnergeticHay

Jul 30, 2020

0

#297

Wow Homsar, very touched that you are doing this for others

Homsar

Jul 30, 2020

0

#298

EnergeticHay wrote:

Wow Homsar, very touched that you are doing this for others

Thanks! If you’re interested, feel free to send me a game... Although I don’t know how much an NM could benefit from anything I have to say.

Homsar

Jul 31, 2020

0

#299

Hi everyone, this is the most recent update.

https://youtu.be/hFPoHan61T4

Homsar

Aug 1, 2020

0

#300

Hi everyone, here is the most recent update

https://youtu.be/16znYMF6tDw