Never Give Up

Sort:
Avatar of SixKillerrr

Good game
masterpiece

Avatar of ChessMobb

Yep stealing will get u hung! Great Game

Avatar of drmr4vrmr

got too greedy & inattentive... like me! lol

Avatar of ahwanjoshi

i think black is mad

 

he was too ahed

Avatar of Kotron

White sacrificed everypiece just to gain a positional lead.. And that's the reward :)

Avatar of TheOldReb

A comedy of errors ! 

Avatar of blesswell

An elementary blunder by black!!

Avatar of mwill
Kotron wrote:

White sacrificed everypiece just to gain a positional lead.. And that's the reward :)


Not a single sacrifice improved his position... he won because black blundered multiple times as well.

Avatar of Daniel3

Hahaha! What a fun game. Black was like: "B-but...how...what?..." Very nice sacrifices. I don't even know if the ending was what White had been anticipating, but it sure was a surprise! Shows that you should never let your King be drawn out too far.

These sacrifices require some analysis. For example: 29.Rc6 if Black had brought either of his Rooks into play right then, White would have been slaughtered. This pawn sacrifice was kind of speculative, IMO, and might have easily led to something less than a wwin.

Avatar of CapablancaAvenged

I don't understand why you thought you could attack when you had no advantage in space, quality, or quantity.

Also, after 22... Bxe3?? isn't 23. Bxg6 mate?

Avatar of goldendog

We don't see many games showcased here that don't contain gross blunders, but people just can't help saying "look at me!"

Avatar of johnny263

ilikeflags, you're right.  this is clearly not a lesson in never giving up because black blundered their way to a loss.  the more obvious lesson would be always give up when you think you've lost a game because a victory isn't actually a victory if the loser makes a mistake.  

why would the poster say "never give up" unless they realized that white was in a clearly lost position, didn't give up, and then won the game?  you might have a point if the post was titled "look at my vision and how i won this game through chess mastery" but it wasn't

Avatar of Elubas
bobbereight wrote:

I don't understand why you thought you could attack when you had no advantage in space, quality, or quantity.

Also, after 22... Bxe3?? isn't 23. Bxg6 mate?


...Bxe3 was check

Avatar of CapablancaAvenged

oopsie

Avatar of ErrantDeeds

Daylight robbery!

Avatar of mattattack99

Terrible openings by white; not solid sacrifice. Very lucky!

Avatar of SkalaAslan
puka123 wrote:

bad play by both. period.


So what. At a certain level, people are going to play badly. The winning player was rated 1275 and his opponent was 1438. 

At a certain ratings level, and I'd put myself in this category, you come to the grips that you're not going to play perfect chess. You're going to make mistakes, blunders and inaccuracies. 

You don't have to be so condescending about it. 

Bad play by both. Whoop-de-do. 

I for one say congratulations on the win. 

Way to pull it out. 

Avatar of msoewulff

its more for the lawlz

Avatar of eXecute

22. Rd4, if he takes the rook, Bxg3#, if he doesn't, you're still threating a nasty check and he can't attack your king as strongly.

24. Rf2 blocking the queen, Sure he has the tactical advantage of Bishop check (to make you lose your rook, but it actually also leads to that quick g4 checkmate.

Avatar of HelloGuido17

cmon play me.........