Oh, and move 95 is where McShane really takes control of this game - gaining a 1.4 advantage.
Game Analysis of 160+ moves - McShane-SHort
Sort:
wow. My newest computer analysis has me make 21 mistakes. I still won
I don't think I've ever seen a game before where I had no idea what was going on for like a hundred moves or so. Complete and utter double-dutch. I must make a note to myself not to watch any more games between this pair of snooze-artists.
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a game before where I had no idea what was going on for like a hundred moves or so. Complete and utter double-dutch. I must make a note to myself not to watch any more games between this pair of snooze-artists.
You don't like take back games?
That's more like it!
Dec 15, 2009
0
#9
Rookbuster wrote:
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a game before where I had no idea what was going on for like a hundred moves or so. Complete and utter double-dutch. I must make a note to myself not to watch any more games between this pair of snooze-artists.
You don't like take back games?
it was a takeback game between me and Antoly, but we were replaying the moves of McShane and Short.
lol
Let it be noted we were following the McShane-Short game from London to see what analysis would show. (thanks for posting it) I had no idea what was going on a lot of the time either.
What makes it funnier is we messed up the first time after 50-some moves, and had to start another game. (We made the second one take-back.)
P_U_N wrote:
Rookbuster wrote:
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a game before where I had no idea what was going on for like a hundred moves or so. Complete and utter double-dutch. I must make a note to myself not to watch any more games between this pair of snooze-artists.
You don't like take back games?
it was a takeback game between me and Antoly, but we were replaying the moves of McShane and Short.
Thank you but I needed no clarification, I was fully aware of the origin of the game when I made my comments.
Dec 15, 2009
0
#12
Thank you but I needed no clarification, I was fully aware of the origin of the game when I made my comments.
it was @Rookbuster
http://www.chess.com/news_/view/carlsen-beats-kramnik-in-london-4788
SPecial thanks to Anatoly - I got my moneys worth - it took chess.com 40 minutes to go through the game.