You know, it is possible to win without the queen. He should have captured the bishop, and played on.
Game I recently played
His main fault was not following the proper proved opening of the French Defense 4... Bb4 5.Bg5 with a few variations after that for decent counterplay as black. You were able to capitalize on his blunder 4...Ne4 as well as getting your knight to a nice post on his weak e5 square while also taking his dark-squared bishop. Even with the mistake of his queen, he made many blunders before that in the opening which is why it is so important to have a basic knowlege of openings. Even before moving out his queen, you dominated in the opening and their are clear advantages for white.

Why are you bragging with this game? Since it is obvious your opponent just raged hard because he launches his bishop to e5, hahaha. Pathetic.

10...Qh4 is surely a mistake. I don't see any reason to move the queen on that square so early. Much better to develop the other minor pieces.

Why are you bragging with this game? Since it is obvious your opponent just raged hard because he launches his bishop to e5, hahaha. Pathetic.
I'm not bragging at all lol. I'm asking what I should of done better.

This is a game I recently played and I think it's a great example of why you should never bring your queen out too early. I was white. Anything I could of done better? I may start posting these analizing forums more often.
Nice game...9...Bxe5 was not very inspired though :)
http://chess-teacher.com/1632.html
This is a game I recently played and I think it's a great example of why you should never bring your queen out too early. I was white. Anything I could of done better? I may start posting these analizing forums more often.