Game

I thought i was going to win this one. But, of course, it turned out to be my requiem.I think my opponent played it quit well considering the circumstances. As usual, the computer analysis considers every move that i make a mistake. But, what is your analysis? I think this game illustrates well the superiority of the knight compared to the bishop!

I realize that move 30 was a big mistake. And some other moves may be questionable. But, i am playing many games. Besides, i like to take chances occasionally.

First off, King's gambit? Are you serious? Nobody uses that at top level anymore.

3. Bc4? Opening principles, knights first, then bishops. Nf3 and you're fine.

15. Nf8+? You can thank your opponent for blundering there, with that backlog in development you have no time to horse around (hehe, get it, horse around?)

25. c3?? Did it look like he wanted to keep that knight there? Kf2 and you are better

32. Nd5??

Resignation - premature, I've saved worse positions. Other than those, nothing major jumps up at me,

I'm open for a challenge,,,King's Gambit!

Kings Gambit is a perfectly respectable opening though the Bishops Gambit 3.Bc4 is provacative. Carry on playing these romantic openings.

Your opponent took up the challenge with 3...Qh4+ instead of the solid and probably best 3...Nf6.

Qe1 exchanging queens does not fit with the opening and I would recommend instead Nc3.