How did I do? (1250)

Sort:
Avatar of Benzodiazepine

Good night.

Avatar of Zigwurst

I don't think you know what a free pawn is @Benz.

Avatar of Tom102

Loving this convo

Avatar of Benzodiazepine
rocketboosterSF wrote:

Judging by his avatar he doesn't care...

I know life can be unfair but I am here to show I care.
You may not be near but I know you can hear.
I pray this makes you cheer as it echos in your sweet ear.

Avatar of Tom102
Benzodiazepine wrote:

Bro I'm drunk.

 

But I think u think that u can impress us here with your 1276 rating when you write in your topic 1250. Oh, how modest! You not impressin' us bro! Please!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOT AAAAAAAAAAAAAT AAAAAAAAAAALLLLLL

Ok, now, we should all get pissed. It's weekend here, call in sick tomorrow.

Hey :) My 5th move was better than your suggestion, just saying :)

I also one 1298 should I write 1300 next time?

Avatar of Benzodiazepine

No, and now shut up. I want rocketboosterSF to read my poem. I worked hard on it.

Avatar of Rebhaf214

It's not "shouldn't of", it's "shouldn't have" or "shouldn't've" (a double contraction) if you will. "Shouldn't of" means nothing.

Avatar of Tom102
Rebhaf214 wrote:

It's not "shouldn't of", it's "shouldn't have" or "shouldn't've" (a double contraction) if you will. "Shouldn't of" means nothing.

If all you're going to do is be a grammar nazi and not give me any advice on my game then don't even both replying.

Avatar of bigpoison
Tom102 wrote:
Rebhaf214 wrote:

It's not "shouldn't of", it's "shouldn't have" or "shouldn't've" (a double contraction) if you will. "Shouldn't of" means nothing.

If all you're going to do is be a grammar nazi and not give me any advice on my game then don't even both replying.

The advice he gave you was good.  Rather than giving him orders, maybe you should thank him. 

Avatar of Tom102
bigpoison wrote:
Tom102 wrote:
Rebhaf214 wrote:

It's not "shouldn't of", it's "shouldn't have" or "shouldn't've" (a double contraction) if you will. "Shouldn't of" means nothing.

If all you're going to do is be a grammar nazi and not give me any advice on my game then don't even both replying.

The advice he gave you was good.  Rather than giving him orders, maybe you should thank him. 

It wasn't advice on my game. I'm pretty sure this section of the forums is called "game analysis", do correct me if I'm wrong.

Avatar of OldChessDog

To quote Ben Finegold, "terrible!"

It would have to be his judgement--what the hell do I know? Watch his videos though on you tube and here on Chess.com--they're really good ;-)

Avatar of Tom102
chessmicky wrote:

 Egregious errors in spelling and grammar make you sound less intelligent and credible than you undoubtedly are.  If I were you I would attempt to learn from the corrections that people are offering instead of calling people “grammar Nazis.”   As a native English speaker living in Brussels many years ago, I was grateful to any local who took the time to help correct my rudimentary French. Partly as a result of their help, I was a pretty fluent speaker by the time I had to return to the U.S.

 

You're right, I agree with you looking back on it.

Avatar of rowsweep

that was a great game.

wakah wakah wakah