How is it blunder

how is it blunder... isnt it checkmate if they take the rook.... wth is this

Let's stop for a moment and admire how useless and bad Game review is. White loses the rook, and Game review says so, but there's literally no way to find out how... unless you leave Game review and go to Analysis.

I never understood (and never will) how can people use Game review and claim that "it's useful for low rated players because it explains what is going on". Hell no. Quite the opposite.

After g6,

QH3 ITS NOT THAT HARD STOCKFISH

And ppl say stockfish is good at chess

After qh3, qxh7#

It's hard to figure out what you were thinking there. Did you want to take your own rook? Or the black knight? Anyhow, it's not mate.

The pawn blocks the bishop from helping to kill rook 🤯

The knight takes the rook, no?

IT WILL BE A CHECKMATE BRO

Nah

yes on the comment before mes move

Okay, so 2. Qh3 Nxh7 3. Qxh7+ Kxh7. The g6 pawn is still there.

Next time you should try to double-check your calculations before you start insulting Stockfish.

g3 followed by Nxh7. after that Qxh7 is not a checkmate bcz bishop is not protecting h7 as g6 pawn blocks its way

G6 first is brutal, unfortunately :/

Remember, there is a button "Show moves", and if they don't show the follow-up, you can use self-analysis. It's just for future 😉

Also, always remember to pay attention for those tricky pawn zwischenzug tactics, don't calculate just one move ahead