Are "Brilliant moves" in computer analysis just any decent sacrifice now?

I have 119 brilliant moves

I have seven and no surprise 

 I played Nh6
If Rock takes on h6 then  Qf7 check,
Kh8 forced
And Re8, forcing the queen to take on e8 and then i win the queen.

I don't think its a brilliant, but I did think about this move for like 3 mins.

The great moves are common

yeh

I had three in one of my recent games

I have in total seen 5 brilliant moves in my games (1 per game); 3 by me and 2 by my opponents. Out of my 3 moves, 2 were against actual persons and 1 against computer. There was actually nothing special about my brilliant moves. In all my moves, there were piece sacrifices involved. Also, it didn’t lead to winning positions in 1 of my games and in both the games by my opponents, I won. Also, in 2 of my games, the moves were played after some blunder or inaccuracy. Link to my 2 games are - https://www.chess.com/live/game/60835161421 (11. Nxg4), https://www.chess.com/live/game/60616204987 (34. Rxh3+). Hope it helps.

This is fake "Game Review analysis", conceived to increase the sense of personal well-being of participants and to counteract their immense sense of despair, at being told they have committed blunders.

I got brilliant for making what appeared an obvious move to me... I guess most players would take the castle with their castle?

I've had multiple !! moves in a single game.

I have been receiving quite a few this month. It makes me proud as well as scared.

You are forking checkmate and a knight.

This move, capturing a Bishop, seemed like an obvious move to me.

I've only had one in my 200 or so games.

i had a few on an old account but very rare

I don't exactly remember, but I've had 3 brilliant moves in my account so far out of the games that I've analyzed.

One was a quite obvious move to me, but it was a greek gift sac (Bxh2+) so I just took it as a brilliant.

The other two... not so much. One was a very obvious king retreat, and another was a very obvious king-rook fork. I don't really know what the "brilliancies" are supposed to mean, but I try not to rely on it too much, as the moves that I actually consider brilliant are never one lol. 

The most simple way to understand how the computer determines brilliancies is as a move which is the best by a large margin and which offers your opponent material in some way. There's more to it I believe, but that's practically it. With that in mind they aren't too rare for tactically minded players willing to sacrifice- usually I'm more level headed when attacking, but I I had one game with 4 (over the board, I was Black here):

I'm sure many other players here have games with multiple as well, it just depends on how you approach attacking.

How do I get chessbase 17?