Are "Brilliant moves" in computer analysis just any decent sacrifice now?

After "blundering" on move 57 (I missed a free bishop for a pawn) I received a brilliant move for 58 (sac the knight with an unstoppable sac of one of my two pawns while the other queens). On move 52 I had seen the idea and was so focused on it that I missed the fork on 57.

So a brilliant move could also be a subtle but winning sacrifice.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/475241067?tab=analysis

Nice win. In the review, would you rather not see a blunder or see a brilliant move?

I'm fine with seeing both. In OTB I'm known for ingenious defenses/conter-attacks after falling into a bad position.

Seems like a lot are

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/78211798071?tab=analysis

I got brilliant rook move

Are brilliant moves rating dependent in game analysis? If so this could explain some seemingly basic moves being considered brilliant.

Who are you

any decent sacrifice is brilliant, such as this:

In this game: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/78675172945?tab=review

Why do I get brilliants for moves such as a pawn takes pawn or other moves which just look like the best move?

There might be a piece somewhere else on the board that you are sacrificing that you didn't realize

I got a checkmate brilliant-great move combo with a queen and bishop

.

So I picked up chess 2 weeks ago and idk how I never picked it up before. I honestly didn’t know they were rare. I’ve gotten 4 out of the first 2 weeks of playing. But when looking at the move, i don’t know how they weren’t the obvious play for a computer to pick up on. Wasn’t anything special.

Ok Ik I have a pretty low elo compared to some, but I don’t find brilliant moves to be rare, I get one sometimes once a day, most of the time 2 times a month but it’s normally only a knight sac

I don't know because this move is a 'decent sacrifice' but not classified as brilliant

Off topic but may someone please tech me how to make your chess games like that I’ve been wanting to know because links imo are stupid

Grind in lichess.org puzzles and practice on lichess.org....

This is actually how I do it...

Hi everyone, I've been following the discussion on Chess.com about how rare 'brilliant moves' are in computer analysis. It's fascinating to see the debate on what constitutes a brilliant move in the eyes of advanced chess algorithms.