I think Chessmaster is a good tool for practicing against, and it will give some natural language analysis that is helpful for the beginning player. Go into training mode. From chess.com, get your game as a PGN and open it in a text editor. Select all and copy. Now go back to chessmaster and select edit--->paste--->PGN. Then after the game is loaded, go to mentor---->game analysis and enter the time per move for the analysis. I would do a minimum of 20 seconds. Once it is finished, you will be able to review the game and get natural language analysis.
Eventually you will find you want to be able to quickly review a game for blunders and focus on the key moves and chessmaster is not very efficient for that. You will also want to use a stronger engine and a better/faster interface.
The chessbase products are great and you can install any engine to them (like houdini, stockfish, and komodo). ChessOK's Aquarium is also excellent and has some unique features, like IDEA, for very deep analysis....but most people prefer chessbase and that is the gold standard. I have both. I use chessbase 12 as my database and primary analysis tool to review my games, and I use Aquarium for studying opening variations in more depth.
But you can get some great programs for free. Scid vs. PC is an excellent database and you can install the Stockfish chess engine. Both free.
For all these alternatives, the engine analysis will just give you a numerical evaluation and you will need to work out why the candidate moves are better than others by playing through the lines suggested by the engine.
Not sure if that helps or not. Short version I would keep using chessmaster as a sparring partner but at least get SCID and Stockfish for your database and to do more in depth (and faster) analysis of your games. Chessmaster is pretty slow for analysis by comparison.
Hi.
I'm a beginner of chess. I started to play chess 3 weeks ago. My rating in chess.com (standard) is around 1,200 with just a few games.
I purchased chessmaster XI GM edition the other day. It's really fun, but I have some questions about the software. I hope anybody could help me.
I guess, though I'm a beginner, investigating past games must be pretty important to improve my skills. When we'd like to learn from famous games, maybe several explanation would be available in books, webs and so on. But when we'd like to learn from past games played by ourselves, what can we do in chessmaster? This is my question.
When we play `Ranked Play', we can see what was the worst move in a dialog after the game. Also a kind of graphic chart is available. We can save the game, load it in training mode, and use several useful functions such as Advice.
Meanwhile when we played in the other places (chess.com, anywhere, you can name it) and just have PGN, what can we do in chessmaster? We can load it in training mode. We can use `Advice' or some other functions. If we clearly recognize what movement was pretty bad, we can use such useful functions. But I guess it would be difficult to recognize what movement was really bad, and I'm wondering how we can do analysis for such things.
I checked past discussions in this forum. Some people say `just buy Fritz'. The other say `Scid'. But those opinions were pretty old one. So can I ask you this question again?
Thank you in advance.