4. Qxf7#
I can't believe I lost this game...
Sort:
Jul 25, 2016
0
#3
You shouldn't swap pieces unless it gives you some sort of advantage - don't exchange just for the sake of it. Also, try not to give away pieces for nothing - you lost some pawns in the ending that eventually killed ya.
What did you do wrong? Everything. You did everything wrong. This won't be a pretty read, but it will help you to improve.
ChessOath wrote:
What did you do wrong? Everything. You did everything wrong. This won't be a pretty read, but it will help you to improve.
He's much lower rated than you are. You and I might think that chess isn't very difficult, but he doesn't.
You do know that you can give criticism without being excessively nasty? For goodness sake... you are such a narcissist.
Gamificast wrote:
He's much lower rated than you are. You and I might think that chess isn't very difficult, but he doesn't.
You think that chess isn't very difficult? You come out with more and more crap every time you post. I've given him quite a lot of advice there. If he wants to be insulted by the way that I've made my points then that's on him. Chess is hard. Stop being such an idiot all the time.
ChessOath wrote:
Gamificast wrote:
You think that chess isn't very difficult? You come out with more and more crap every time you post. I've given him quite a lot of advice there. If he wants to be insulted by the way that I've made my points then that's on him. Chess is hard. Stop being such an idiot all the time.
Goodness sake - you were the one that acted like chess was easy - saying crap like "why play this" and "this idiot really wants to lose to you". You come out with more crap every time you post - I don't. What an absolute hypocritical moron you are.
I know full well that chess is hard - what I obviously meant was that you and I find it easier than some people do. Stop twisting my words to suit you.
I didn't twist anything. That was a direct quote. I came here to help the OP improve. He asked for help and I gave it to him. You came here because you don't like me and you're achieving nothing other than ruining this thread. Get lost.
ChessOath, i think your analysis was wrong, and he could draw by taking the pawn, but im not sure. Look:
Edit: how could i miss 4.h7! Bxh7 5 c8=Q
4.c8/a7 and the Bishop is deflected. It's a case of the Bishop being able to defend only one side of the board. The King is required to defend but is misplaced so the game is lost.
caezx wrote:
Edit: how could i miss 4.h7! Bxh7 5 c8=Q
This 
Jul 25, 2016
0
#12
chessoath is a professional troll. He's in every forum on the site giving his egocentric criticism. NASTY!
ChessOath wrote:
I didn't twist anything. That was a direct quote. I came here to help the OP improve. He asked for help and I gave it to him. You came here because you don't like me and you're achieving nothing other than ruining this thread. Get lost.
No-one on this site likes you. It's not just me. Gee, I wonder why, hmm?
Yes, I make mistakes, and I apologise for that. I occasionally misword things, or say things that I don't mean. But most sane people are understanding of this fact. They don't care nearly as much, and accept apologies. People like you though don't care about any of that. All you care about is get a thrill out of pointing out other people's mistakes or faults. You are a troll and egotistical narcissist through and through. Fact. And if you don't accept that, tough.
This site would be better off without trolls like you. If you don't want to be called a troll all of the time, change your attitude.
he is trying to give constructive criticism but I can see how he is being "nasty"
spawkle529 wrote:
he is trying to give constructive criticism but I can see how he is being "nasty"
I'm giving advice the way that I would want it given to me. There's little point in being nice when giving advice. Knowing that something is wrong is one thing, but knowing how wrong it is is also important. You don't get that from someone being nice.
If you noticed, most of the heavy criticism came on the moves that made no sense, but didn't change the evaluation. The ones that he needs to know are really really bad. The blunders that he would otherwise overlook the importance of going forward because in this specific game they didn't really matter.
If I was able to accompany the advice with a solid statement of fact that it changed the evaluation I didn't insult. The "nasty" comments are there purely to help with the analysis. There's no ego (I know you didn't say there was), there's no narcissism, there's nothing of the kind.
I only direct this at you because I'm done talking to Gam.
Jul 25, 2016
0
#17
How did that black-squared Bishop suddenly become a white-squared one ?
AussieRookie wrote:
How did that black-squared Bishop suddenly become a white-squared one ?
LOL
Lasker1900 wrote:
ChessOath's criticism may be a bit on the enthusiastic side, but from a chess point of view, I think he is telling the OP exactly what he needs to hear.
I forgot to say thanks when I first saw this because I was editing minor mistakes in my #17 post (I always go over posts quickly after posting and edit out most of the English mistakes). Thanks.
ChessOath I want to say thank you for your time. It's really nice to get a feedback from a great player. I assume you're great player considering your rating. You spent a lot of time analyzing my game, thanks for that. I really apprieciate your tips.
Lasker1900 thanks for your comment. I'll do my best at looking to the board more carefully.
I've started to learn/improve my chess game only two months ago. I know I have to learn lots of new stuff. I know I won't be able to achieve high rating because I'm to old for this [I'm 24], but I'll do my best.
Thanks for your support guys. And please do not fight with each other 
I had an advantage... and still lost the game... I'm soooo angry at myself. Could anyone tell me what was the main problem in my game. I was playing black