I need feedback!

Hey guys i of course suck, But i think this game was *ALRIGHT* and i think there are lots of mistakes and blunders here. Can someone give me feedback on the game?

Looks like a good game. I think King safety is a theme of the middle game. You had time to develop b6 and Bb7 rather than Rg8+ but I think your analysis and play is aware of that. Managing to connect the rooks would make the king side attack even more dangerous and white can't pawn break in the middle as the bishop and queen are ready to become a deadly battery after the knight moves. I might play about with this and work out a game plan. I like the set up you have here.

Soo, the challenge was to not make a book moves? Cause you two managed that one quite well by breaking theory in just 2 move sequences. None of you followed basic opening principles, like, AT ALL. But in all honesty, i liked it. I never saw such chaotic duel. You managed to create positions that i genuinely would had no idea how to get out of. And thats TRULY unique experience...

I probably should put it in archives.

No there was no challenge. It is just a wild 10 minute rapid game.

In this case i would suggest to study the "opening theory", i guess?

Opening theory is develop pieces and counter what oponent's idea is, then launch an attack on one side while they attack on the other. Black queenside, and white kingside attack in the Sicilian. But that is not always exclusive if the position calls for something else. Opening was fine until f3 was played. Neither player addressed king safety during the mobilisation phase, hence the midgame scramble and trade offs. However both players attacked where they were strongest as white attacked queen side and black was aiming everything at white's kingside. Conclusion. Queen side castling for black can happen in Sicilian, but it is difficult. The king side attack exposed the black king to a counter attack and the lack of king safety lost to much time to gain back the initiative for black before simplification happened.