Is Bxd5 really that bad here?

Sort:
tupacisback305
 
 
 
 
In this position I went Bxd5 (+0.16) (inaccuracy).
The computer wanted Re1 (+1.39) (best)
 
 
Is Bxd5 really that bad of a move or is Re1 really that much of a good move? I see Bxd5 as an even trade. I get rid of the opponents centralized knight. I know moving rooks to open or semi open files is best but I don't see what's so special about it in this case or what's so inherently bad about Bxd5.
 
Can anyone explain or is this just some computer engine stuff
play4fun64

Black has a bad bishop on c8. Bxd5 rxd6 activate the black bishop. Re1 is really better for white.

tupacisback305
play4fun64 wrote:

Black has a bad bishop on c8. Bxd5 rxd6 activate the black bishop. Re1 is really better for white.

Good point! I did not see that. Thanks!

tygxc

Bxd5 gives up the bishop's pair. Bc4 is white's good bishop, not on the color of its own pawns, while Bc1 is white's bad bishop, not on the color of its own pawns.
Re1 is a good move, as it activates the rook.

Kaon_497

There’s no real immediate need for trading, and in the long term normally bishops could be better in open positions, and immediately the development of the bad bishop of black becomes very easy and it stops being a bad bishop. In this position I would be mainly looking at mainly Re1, Qe2 or Qc2, probably failing to play Re1.

Mazetoskylo

See it like that: Black has a "good" knight at d5 which does nothing special, he lacks space, as well as a decent way to put the Bc8 in the game. Also, his kingside (especially h7) is vulnerable as only the king gives protection, so the plan would be: Avoid exchanges which allow Black to breathe, and organize a kingside attack.

The most natural move is 10.Bd3, but it does allow Black to play ...f5(f6) with a hint of counterplay. So, one has to pick between 10.Ne4 and 10.Re1, and I do not think one of them is better than the other.