Is it possible to get 100% accuracy in a game?

Sort:
Crossiantismid

Bro the only way is by using hacks or MAguns and Hikaru together on the same team

AGC-Gambit_YT
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:

You are looking like a fool. We have already explained to you this is not Scholar's, it's a variation in the Scotch.

Yes you said "in your opinion" but that does not make you look less of a fool. If I called chess, checkers, "in my opinion", people would still think it's stupid.

Less of a fool. Bro u are 1200 and shouldn't be yapping, and two it has the sequence of scholar's I already said that it's not the actual scholar's opening, really hop off the computer kid.

AGC-Gambit_YT
Crossiantismid wrote:

Bro the only way is by using hacks or MAguns and Hikaru together on the same team

maybe for u

Crossiantismid

Bro I am Maguns in an alt

AGC-Gambit_YT

bro shut up

Crossiantismid

frustrated

AGC-Gambit_YT

really? beat me in best of 3.

xor_eax_eax05
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:

You are looking like a fool. We have already explained to you this is not Scholar's, it's a variation in the Scotch.

Yes you said "in your opinion" but that does not make you look less of a fool. If I called chess, checkers, "in my opinion", people would still think it's stupid.

Less of a fool. Bro u are 1200 and shouldn't be yapping, and two it has the sequence of scholar's I already said that it's not the actual scholar's opening, really hop off the computer kid.

It does not take a GrandMaster to know the names of a few variations. Something you seem to struggle with.

"imagine playing scholars"

That's what you said. Then you tried to back down claiming it's just "in your opinion". That does not make it sound any less stupid. Again, if you want to, "in your opinion", call chess checkers, or call a dog "cat", you are going to sound really dumb. Saying "in my opinion" is not going to excuse you from looking like a fool.

altwhales

I got 100% accuracy in a game(I was White against my friend):

https://www.chess.com/game/live/126470369739

hello-family

I’m going to a party

mrsean12345

yess

Deflection

Its possible actually

hello-family

Ok thank you so much

Merciless_Boy

even stockfish can't get 100 accuracy from beginning to endgame

WingsofFireElias

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5XodaNR3ux?tab=review

AGC-Gambit_YT
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:

You are looking like a fool. We have already explained to you this is not Scholar's, it's a variation in the Scotch.

Yes you said "in your opinion" but that does not make you look less of a fool. If I called chess, checkers, "in my opinion", people would still think it's stupid.

Less of a fool. Bro u are 1200 and shouldn't be yapping, and two it has the sequence of scholar's I already said that it's not the actual scholar's opening, really hop off the computer kid.

It does not take a GrandMaster to know the names of a few variations. Something you seem to struggle with.

"imagine playing scholars"

That's what you said. Then you tried to back down claiming it's just "in your opinion". That does not make it sound any less stupid. Again, if you want to, "in your opinion", call chess checkers, or call a dog "cat", you are going to sound really dumb. Saying "in my opinion" is not going to excuse you from looking like a fool.

doesn't take a GM you're right. So why are you yapping as if you are one. You are the real fool here.

WingsofFireElias

https://www.chess.com/analysis?fen=5n2%2F5kp1%2F2q1p2p%2F1p2n3%2F4PQ2%2F1B4PP%2FP4P2%2F6K1+b+-+-+1+36&flip=false&pgn=%5BEvent+%22%3F%22%5D%0A%5BSite+%22%3F%22%5D%0A%5BDate+%22%3F%3F%3F%3F.%3F%3F.%3F%3F%22%5D%0A%5BRound+%22%3F%22%5D%0A%5BWhite+%22%3F%22%5D%0A%5BBlack+%22%3F%22%5D%0A%5BResult+%22*%22%5D%0A%0A1.+e4+e5+2.+Nf3+Nc6+3.+Bb5+a6+4.+Ba4+Nf6+5.+O-O+Be7+6.+Re1+b5+7.+Bb3+d6+8.+c3%0AO-O+9.+h3+Na5+10.+Bc2+c5+11.+d4+Qc7+12.+Nbd2+Nc6+13.+dxc5+dxc5+14.+Nf1+Be6+15.%0ANe3+Rad8+16.+Qe2+c4+17.+Nf5+Rfe8+18.+Bg5+Nd7+19.+Bxe7+Nxe7+20.+Ng5+h6+21.+Nxe6%0Afxe6+22.+Ne3+Ng6+23.+g3+Nf6+24.+Red1+Rxd1%2B+25.+Rxd1+Rd8+26.+Rxd8%2B+Qxd8+27.+b3%0Acxb3+28.+Bxb3+Nf8+29.+c4+Qd7+30.+Qc2+Qb7+31.+cxb5+axb5+32.+Ng4+N6d7+33.+Qd3+Qc6%0A34.+Qe3+Kf7+35.+Nxe5%2B+Nxe5+36.+Qf4%2B+*&tab=review

Jahnavi-Shankar

GM Capablanca got 100% accuracy once.

Calebaleb12

I have gotten a 100% accuracy before! He auto resigned. happy.png

Games4life1
Yes