Longest individual notation?

Sort:
Avatar of LeoLe2016
shopkin802 wrote:
eric0022 wrote:

Many pawn moves can ocur in games, each of which resets the 50-move count. Probably the game can extend to like 2000 moves? (if White is the player to wipe out the entire army of Black, then the maximum number of pawn pushes is 6 x 8 = 48, while the maximum number of captures is 15, so the absolute maximum number of moves in the game without a 50 move rule being claimed is (48 + 15 + 1) x 50 = 3200, while the maximum number of moves without meeting the 75 move automatic draw is (48 + 15 + 1) x 75 = 4800,texas roadhouse calories but it is hard to achieve the first 50 moves without captures, pawn pushes and breaching the threefold repetition rule).

Yes i see this

no it is actually

8848.5 moves long
Avatar of Pudding

I'm getting confused

Avatar of herodrakon
Snorlaximus wrote:
0-0-0+ is the longest one that I think will actually happen in games

Well, in extremely rare cases you can have O-O-O#, but i think youre right in the sense that it is more common for that to happen

Avatar of herodrakon
LeoLe2016 wrote:

i think it is Qa1xh8++ or fxe8=Q++

maybe if you use descriptive notation you could get something like P-KB8=Q#

Avatar of I0l

9 letters!! if we made this position move 1000 it would be 1000. cxd8=N#!! 14 letters (with space)

Avatar of ChairHasProtein

Does double check like “++” count,because you could have like axb8=n++ with double check,consisting of 9 characters

Avatar of aishanichidananda

Rae8xe4+

Avatar of eiieiiwiwiiiww

Is There a 5 digit nonation?

Avatar of 1upda

cxb8=N++

ra1rf1++

bxc6e.p.++

Avatar of 1upda

ra1xrf1++

Avatar of Tacosweep
Avatar of izzyfalken
gxf8=Q+
Avatar of izzyfalken
It’s probably 8 or 9 characters
Avatar of izzyfalken
I found fake notation
Avatar of izzyfalken
ra1xef1++ isn’t possible because there is no piece able to do a discovered attack by you moving the rook
Avatar of Chessking-134
 I just settled up the move for ra1xef1++

Wait wouldn't this be a promotion for the pawn?

Avatar of fraserhm

So I guess it’s just seven?

Avatar of 1upda
izzyfalken wrote:
ra1xef1++ isn’t possible because there is no piece able to do a discovered attack by you moving the rook

i wrote ra1xf1++ not ra1xef1

plus, what if there was a bishop diagonally behind the rook and there were two other bishops controlling the diagonals beside, and the rook was doubly disambiguated

Avatar of 1upda

but that would only work if the rook was on b1 and there we go. we have another long notation

Avatar of 1upda

bxc8=Q1/2-1/2