Analysis
Off topic
Sort:
http://support.chess.com/Tickets/Submit/RenderForm
In the meantime, you should edit your posts to remove the name of your suspect. Public "naming and shaming" is forbidden and can get you in trouble.
What makes you think he is cheating?
Oct 5, 2013
0
#5
I looked at your game and nobody cheated. You played very dumb. That is all. You are pathetic to accuse somebody like that when you give away pieces and make silly moves.
If I'd known they were bullet games, I wouldn't have bothered posting.
Oct 5, 2013
0
#7
I only looked at the last game and since it is a two minute game no critique. But black was allowed to position his knight in a strong spot and after that white gives away a knight and allows his king to be mated. Nothing incredibly deep besides moves that a good player would make. Why accuse somebody on the basis of that. It sounds very emotional. But if you put GM in your name, then i guess anything can be expected.
DAVID_CARRUTHERS wrote:
is there time to use a engine in a 2/1 live game ?
As much as people seem to like using speed games as a foolproof way to avoid cheaters it's just not true. It's very possible to use an engine to cheat in a 2/1 game.
You played horrible, your opponent just had an easy game.
the most direct way to see if there is a suspicion for using computers in the game is analysing it with several computer engines. you can't determine a cheat by one game alone so you go ahead and analyse 8+ games. if you can see a pattern of following computer moves for over 90% games you can make a suspicion . short games arent very informative for that matter as they only demonstrate how you blundered ... it's harder to use computer within bullet time controls so please check your accusation before posting one .
DAVID_CARRUTHERS wrote:
is there time to use a engine in a 2/1 live game ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jATffyCre8c
Analysis